PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XESC.L vs. SX5S.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XESC.L vs. SX5S.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XESC.L having a 6.52% return and SX5S.L slightly lower at 6.46%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XESC.L having a 11.56% annualized return and SX5S.L not far behind at 11.41%.


XESC.L

1D
0.98%
1M
4.88%
YTD
6.52%
6M
7.72%
1Y
19.01%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
11.67%
10Y*
11.56%

SX5S.L

1D
0.35%
1M
4.85%
YTD
6.46%
6M
7.51%
1Y
18.61%
3Y*
15.51%
5Y*
11.51%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XESC.L vs. SX5S.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XESC.L
Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C
6.52%28.16%6.11%20.06%-3.40%15.50%3.15%21.73%-10.68%14.50%
SX5S.L
Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF
6.46%27.68%6.13%19.91%-3.67%14.48%2.12%23.51%-10.62%14.35%

Correlation

The correlation between XESC.L and SX5S.L is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2014

0.83

The correlation between XESC.L and SX5S.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (all time) to 0.99 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XESC.L vs. SX5S.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XESC.L
SX5S.L

Financial Services

26.0%
25.1%

Industrials

22.9%
22.1%

Technology

16.7%
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
9.8%

Healthcare

5.6%
5.4%

Energy

5.4%
5.2%

Utilities

5.0%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
5.5%

Communication Services

2.4%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

XESC.L
26.0%
SX5S.L
25.1%

Industrials

XESC.L
22.9%
SX5S.L
22.1%

Technology

XESC.L
16.7%
SX5S.L
16.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XESC.L
10.2%
SX5S.L
9.8%

Healthcare

XESC.L
5.6%
SX5S.L
5.4%

Energy

XESC.L
5.4%
SX5S.L
5.2%

Utilities

XESC.L
5.0%
SX5S.L
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

XESC.L
4.1%
SX5S.L
5.5%

Communication Services

XESC.L
2.4%
SX5S.L
2.3%

Basic Materials

XESC.L
1.8%
SX5S.L
3.7%

Real Estate

XESC.L

-

SX5S.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XESC.L vs. SX5S.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XESC.L
XESC.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XESC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XESC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XESC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
XESC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
XESC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

SX5S.L
SX5S.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SX5S.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SX5S.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XESC.L vs. SX5S.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XESC.LSX5S.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.23

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

1.62

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.52

5.40

+0.11

XESC.L vs. SX5S.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XESC.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the SX5S.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XESC.L and SX5S.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XESC.LSX5S.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.23

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.69

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.73

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.59

-0.11

Drawdowns

XESC.L vs. SX5S.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XESC.L drawdown since its inception was -34.48%, which is greater than SX5S.L's maximum drawdown of -32.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XESC.L and SX5S.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XESC.LSX5S.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.48%

-32.54%

-1.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.53%

-11.43%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

-13.85%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.64%

-21.71%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.64%

-32.54%

+0.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.57%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.08%

-5.44%

-1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

3.44%

0.00%

Volatility

XESC.L vs. SX5S.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF 1C (XESC.L) and Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L) have volatilities of 4.85% and 4.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XESC.LSX5S.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.85%

4.90%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

12.23%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.18%

15.09%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.22%

17.62%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.81%

19.88%

-2.07%

XESC.L vs. SX5S.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XESC.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SX5S.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XESC.L vs. SX5S.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XESC.L nor SX5S.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, XESC.L and SX5S.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SX5S.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SX5S.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for XESC.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XESC.L and 0.05% for SX5S.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XESC.L and SX5S.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer