PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XEQT.TO vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XEQT.TO vs. NVDA

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) is Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, XEQT.TO returned 13.69%/yr vs 67.91%/yr for NVDA. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

XEQT.TO vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XEQT.TO is traded in CAD, while NVDA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVDA values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XEQT.TO having a 12.26% return and NVDA slightly higher at 12.39%.

XEQT.TO

1D
0.63%
1M
2.10%
YTD
12.26%
6M
12.73%
1Y
30.96%
3Y*
21.81%
5Y*
13.69%
10Y*
—

NVDA

1D
0.34%
1M
-7.18%
YTD
12.39%
6M
19.06%
1Y
48.72%
3Y*
73.69%
5Y*
67.91%
10Y*
69.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEQT.TO vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		12.26%20.57%24.38%17.27%-10.99%18.98%11.85%8.56%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation		12.39%32.57%194.22%230.95%-47.11%125.37%117.02%49.04%

Correlation

The correlation between XEQT.TO and NVDA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2019

0.56

The correlation between XEQT.TO and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio

NVIDIA Corporation

Often compared with XEQT.TO:
XEQT.TO vs. VFV.TOXEQT.TO vs. VEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. XGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. ZEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. VGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. XEI.TOXEQT.TO vs. VOO
Often compared with NVDA:
NVDA vs. AMDNVDA vs. AAPLNVDA vs. AVGONVDA vs. TSMNVDA vs. SPYNVDA vs. AMZNNVDA vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

XEQT.TO vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XEQT.TO
XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEQT.TO vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XEQT.TONVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.43
1.30

+1.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.31
1.86

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.23

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

2.17

+1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.41

4.91

+10.51

XEQT.TO vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEQT.TO and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XEQT.TO vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.74%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -80.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEQT.TO and NVDA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XEQT.TONVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.74%

-80.18%

+50.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-20.81%

+12.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.08%

-38.45%

+23.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.55%

-63.60%

+44.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-63.60%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-11.16%

+10.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-28.49%

+24.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

9.17%

-7.25%

Volatility

XEQT.TO vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) is 5.02%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 13.40%. This indicates that XEQT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XEQT.TONVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

13.40%

-8.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

26.51%

-16.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

34.74%

-22.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

52.13%

-38.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.58%

50.48%

-34.90%

Dividends

XEQT.TO vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation		0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		1.48%1.66%2.03%2.09%2.14%1.66%1.69%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

XEQT.TO and NVDA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEQT.TO and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer