PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEQT.TO vs. MEQT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEQT.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XEQT.TO having a 4.80% return and MEQT.TO slightly lower at 4.72%.


XEQT.TO

1D
0.41%
1M
3.32%
YTD
4.80%
6M
7.93%
1Y
36.34%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
12.32%
10Y*

MEQT.TO

1D
0.51%
1M
3.12%
YTD
4.72%
6M
6.61%
1Y
37.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEQT.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
4.80%19.47%24.36%2.57%
MEQT.TO
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF
4.72%21.31%25.87%2.16%

Correlation

The correlation between XEQT.TO and MEQT.TO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023

0.51

The correlation between XEQT.TO and MEQT.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (all time) to 0.66 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEQT.TO vs. MEQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEQT.TO
XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

MEQT.TO
MEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEQT.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEQT.TOMEQT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.04

3.31

-0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.15

4.75

-0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.68

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

5.63

-0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.32

24.21

-2.89

XEQT.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is comparable to the MEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEQT.TO and MEQT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEQT.TOMEQT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04

3.31

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

1.92

-1.03

Drawdowns

XEQT.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.74%, which is greater than MEQT.TO's maximum drawdown of -15.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEQT.TO and MEQT.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XEQT.TOMEQT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.74%

-15.14%

-14.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-7.68%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-0.91%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-1.34%

-2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.79%

+0.12%

Volatility

XEQT.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF (MEQT.TO) have volatilities of 5.82% and 5.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XEQT.TOMEQT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

5.55%

+0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

9.50%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

12.14%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.06%

11.95%

+1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.63%

11.95%

+3.68%

XEQT.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEQT.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MEQT.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEQT.TO vs. MEQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than MEQT.TO's 1.57% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
1.59%1.66%2.01%2.07%2.12%1.64%1.66%1.19%
MEQT.TO
Mackenzie All-Equity Allocation ETF
1.57%1.60%1.73%0.81%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%