PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEQT.TO achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than HXT.TO's 11.43% return.


XEQT.TO

1D
-2.62%
1M
1.43%
YTD
10.25%
6M
9.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HXT.TO

1D
1.27%
1M
4.27%
YTD
11.43%
6M
12.87%
1Y
33.83%
3Y*
23.20%
5Y*
14.72%
10Y*
12.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
10.25%14.62%
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF
11.43%19.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XEQT.TO and HXT.TO is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

0.80

XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XEQT.TO
HXT.TO

Technology

22.9%
12.0%

Financial Services

20.3%
37.3%

Industrials

12.1%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
3.9%

Basic Materials

7.3%
12.6%

Energy

7.2%
15.9%

Healthcare

6.6%

-

Communication Services

6.4%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
3.6%

Utilities

2.8%
2.9%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.5%

Technology

XEQT.TO
22.9%
HXT.TO
12.0%

Financial Services

XEQT.TO
20.3%
HXT.TO
37.3%

Industrials

XEQT.TO
12.1%
HXT.TO
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

XEQT.TO
7.8%
HXT.TO
3.9%

Basic Materials

XEQT.TO
7.3%
HXT.TO
12.6%

Energy

XEQT.TO
7.2%
HXT.TO
15.9%

Healthcare

XEQT.TO
6.6%
HXT.TO

-

Communication Services

XEQT.TO
6.4%
HXT.TO
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

XEQT.TO
4.4%
HXT.TO
3.6%

Utilities

XEQT.TO
2.8%
HXT.TO
2.9%

Real Estate

XEQT.TO
2.2%
HXT.TO
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEQT.TO

HXT.TO
HXT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
HXT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HXT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEQT.TOHXT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.23

0.70

+1.52

Drawdowns

XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.25%, smaller than the maximum HXT.TO drawdown of -35.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEQT.TO and HXT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEQT.TOHXT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-35.48%

+27.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

0.00%

-2.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-4.66%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

Volatility

XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEQT.TOHXT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

11.77%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.98%

12.77%

-0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.98%

15.17%

-3.19%

XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEQT.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than HXT.TO's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while HXT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
HXT.TO
Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
1.51%1.66%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEQT.TO and HXT.TO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HXT.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HXT.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XEQT.TO.

XEQT.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while HXT.TO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XEQT.TO and 0.07% for HXT.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEQT.TO and HXT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer