XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO
XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) and HXT.TO (Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while HXT.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index. XEQT.TO is actively managed, while HXT.TO is passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XEQT.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for HXT.TO.
Performance
XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEQT.TO achieves a 10.25% return, which is significantly lower than HXT.TO's 11.43% return.
XEQT.TO
- 1D
- -2.62%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- YTD
- 10.25%
- 6M
- 9.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HXT.TO
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 11.43%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 33.83%
- 3Y*
- 23.20%
- 5Y*
- 14.72%
- 10Y*
- 12.83%
XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 10.25% | 14.62% |
HXT.TO Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF | 11.43% | 19.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEQT.TO and HXT.TO is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025 | 0.80 |
XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XEQT.TO
HXT.TO
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
XEQT.TO
HXT.TO
Financial Services
XEQT.TO
HXT.TO
Industrials
XEQT.TO
HXT.TO
Consumer Cyclical
XEQT.TO
HXT.TO
Basic Materials
XEQT.TO
HXT.TO
Energy
XEQT.TO
HXT.TO
Healthcare
XEQT.TO
HXT.TO
-
Communication Services
XEQT.TO
HXT.TO
Consumer Defensive
XEQT.TO
HXT.TO
Utilities
XEQT.TO
HXT.TO
Real Estate
XEQT.TO
HXT.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XEQT.TO
HXT.TO
XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF (HXT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XEQT.TO | HXT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.23 | 0.70 | +1.52 |
Drawdowns
XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.25%, smaller than the maximum HXT.TO drawdown of -35.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEQT.TO and HXT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEQT.TO | HXT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -35.48% | +27.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.48% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | 0.00% | -2.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.04% | -4.66% | +3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility
XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEQT.TO | HXT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 11.77% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.98% | 12.77% | -0.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.98% | 15.17% | -3.19% |
XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEQT.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than HXT.TO's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XEQT.TO vs. HXT.TO - Dividend Comparison
XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while HXT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HXT.TO Global X S&P/TSX 60 Corporate Class ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.51% | 1.66% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEQT.TO and HXT.TO have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HXT.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HXT.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XEQT.TO.
XEQT.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while HXT.TO is Canada Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XEQT.TO and 0.07% for HXT.TO.
Find the right allocation for XEQT.TO and HXT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer