XEQT.TO vs. FINN.NEO
XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) and FINN.NEO (Fidelity Global Innovators ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XEQT.TO returned 21.61%/yr vs 42.65%/yr for FINN.NEO. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XEQT.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for FINN.NEO.
Performance
XEQT.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEQT.TO achieves a 13.88% return, which is significantly lower than FINN.NEO's 39.95% return.
XEQT.TO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 9.78%
- YTD
- 13.88%
- 1Y
- 27.48%
- 3Y*
- 21.61%
- 5Y*
- 13.37%
- 10Y*
- —
FINN.NEO
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 6.73%
- 6M
- 31.51%
- YTD
- 39.95%
- 1Y
- 59.13%
- 3Y*
- 42.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XEQT.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 13.88% | 20.57% | 24.38% | 8.41% |
FINN.NEO Fidelity Global Innovators ETF | 39.95% | 20.61% | 58.65% | 21.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEQT.TO and FINN.NEO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | 0.74 |
The correlation between XEQT.TO and FINN.NEO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEQT.TO vs. FINN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
XEQT.TO
FINN.NEO
XEQT.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XEQT.TO | FINN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.42 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 4.98 | -1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.28 | 15.65 | -1.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XEQT.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.74%, which is greater than FINN.NEO's maximum drawdown of -25.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEQT.TO and FINN.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEQT.TO | FINN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.74% | -25.66% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.25% | -11.94% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.08% | -25.66% | +10.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -3.62% | +2.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.05% | -3.98% | -0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 3.79% | -1.86% |
Volatility
XEQT.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) is 2.83%, while Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO) has a volatility of 10.26%. This indicates that XEQT.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FINN.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEQT.TO | FINN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 10.26% | -7.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 20.07% | -9.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.27% | 24.63% | -12.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.25% | 22.38% | -9.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.52% | 22.38% | -6.86% |
XEQT.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEQT.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FINN.NEO's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
XEQT.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Dividend Comparison
XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while FINN.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FINN.NEO Fidelity Global Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEQT.TO iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio | 1.60% | 1.66% | 2.03% | 2.09% | 2.14% | 1.66% | 1.69% | 1.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEQT.TO and FINN.NEO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for FINN.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XEQT.TO and 1.09% for FINN.NEO.
Find the right allocation for XEQT.TO and FINN.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer