PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEQT.TO vs. BIGY.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEQT.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF (BIGY.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEQT.TO achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly higher than BIGY.TO's -9.61% return.


XEQT.TO

1D
0.63%
1M
3.45%
YTD
12.26%
6M
12.73%
1Y
30.96%
3Y*
21.81%
5Y*
13.69%
10Y*

BIGY.TO

1D
0.11%
1M
-9.45%
YTD
-9.61%
6M
-11.17%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEQT.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
12.26%5.73%
BIGY.TO
Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF
-9.61%-1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XEQT.TO and BIGY.TO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEQT.TO vs. BIGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEQT.TO
XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

BIGY.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEQT.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF (BIGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XEQT.TOBIGY.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.41

XEQT.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XEQT.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.74%, which is greater than BIGY.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEQT.TO and BIGY.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEQT.TOBIGY.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.74%

-27.81%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-18.91%

+18.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-11.48%

+7.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

Volatility

XEQT.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEQT.TOBIGY.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

29.05%

-16.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

29.05%

-15.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.58%

29.05%

-13.47%

XEQT.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEQT.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BIGY.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XEQT.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than BIGY.TO's 30.05% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BIGY.TO
Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF
30.05%9.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio
1.48%1.66%2.03%2.09%2.14%1.66%1.69%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEQT.TO and BIGY.TO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BIGY.TO.

XEQT.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while BIGY.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XEQT.TO and 0.40% for BIGY.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEQT.TO and BIGY.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer