PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XEQT.TO vs. BANK.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XEQT.TO vs. BANK.TO

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XEQT.TO (iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio) and BANK.TO (Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XEQT.TO is a Global Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while BANK.TO is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Solactive Canadian Core Financials Equal Weight Index. XEQT.TO is actively managed, while BANK.TO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XEQT.TO returned 21.81%/yr vs 34.20%/yr for BANK.TO. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XEQT.TO charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for BANK.TO.

Performance

XEQT.TO vs. BANK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEQT.TO achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly lower than BANK.TO's 23.62% return.

XEQT.TO

1D
0.63%
1M
3.45%
YTD
12.26%
6M
12.73%
1Y
30.96%
3Y*
21.81%
5Y*
13.69%
10Y*
—

BANK.TO

1D
1.08%
1M
8.67%
YTD
23.62%
6M
25.01%
1Y
64.23%
3Y*
34.20%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEQT.TO vs. BANK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		12.26%20.57%24.38%17.27%-8.31%
BANK.TO
Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund		23.62%41.00%27.90%16.23%-20.47%

Correlation

The correlation between XEQT.TO and BANK.TO is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022

0.68

The correlation between XEQT.TO and BANK.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

XEQT.TO vs. BANK.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XEQT.TO
BANK.TO

Financial Services

24.1%
100.0%

Technology

20.6%

-

Energy

11.7%

-

Basic Materials

11.2%

-

Industrials

9.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%

-

Communication Services

5.0%

-

Healthcare

3.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.4%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Financial Services

XEQT.TO
24.1%
BANK.TO
100.0%

Technology

XEQT.TO
20.6%
BANK.TO

-

Energy

XEQT.TO
11.7%
BANK.TO

-

Basic Materials

XEQT.TO
11.2%
BANK.TO

-

Industrials

XEQT.TO
9.8%
BANK.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

XEQT.TO
6.1%
BANK.TO

-

Communication Services

XEQT.TO
5.0%
BANK.TO

-

Healthcare

XEQT.TO
3.6%
BANK.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

XEQT.TO
3.4%
BANK.TO

-

Utilities

XEQT.TO
2.7%
BANK.TO

-

Real Estate

XEQT.TO
1.8%
BANK.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio

Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund

Often compared with XEQT.TO:
XEQT.TO vs. VFV.TOXEQT.TO vs. VEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. XGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. ZEQT.TOXEQT.TO vs. VGRO.TOXEQT.TO vs. XEI.TOXEQT.TO vs. VOO
Often compared with BANK.TO:
BANK.TO vs. HMAX.TOBANK.TO vs. HCAL.TOBANK.TO vs. VDY.TOBANK.TO vs. RBNK.TOBANK.TO vs. HYLD.TOBANK.TO vs. VCN.TOBANK.TO vs. VEQT.TO

Return for Risk

XEQT.TO vs. BANK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XEQT.TO
XEQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
BANK.TO
BANK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
BANK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BANK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEQT.TO vs. BANK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) and Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XEQT.TOBANK.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.43
5.20

-2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.31
7.03

-3.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.97

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.59

7.70

-4.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.41

34.12

-18.70

XEQT.TO vs. BANK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEQT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is lower than the BANK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 5.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEQT.TO and BANK.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XEQT.TO vs. BANK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEQT.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.74%, roughly equal to the maximum BANK.TO drawdown of -29.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEQT.TO and BANK.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XEQT.TOBANK.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.74%

-29.03%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.25%

-8.27%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.08%

-15.49%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.55%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

0.00%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.09%

-8.75%

+4.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.86%

+0.06%

Volatility

XEQT.TO vs. BANK.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund (BANK.TO) at 4.04%. This indicates that XEQT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BANK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XEQT.TOBANK.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

4.04%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.06%

10.58%

-0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

12.25%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.21%

15.66%

-2.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.58%

15.66%

-0.08%

XEQT.TO vs. BANK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEQT.TO has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BANK.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

XEQT.TO vs. BANK.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEQT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than BANK.TO's 12.36% yield.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BANK.TO
Evolve Canadian Banks and Lifecos Enhanced Yield Index Fund		12.36%13.73%15.28%13.60%10.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEQT.TO
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio		1.48%1.66%2.03%2.09%2.14%1.66%1.69%1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

XEQT.TO and BANK.TO have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEQT.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEQT.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BANK.TO.

XEQT.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while BANK.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XEQT.TO and 0.60% for BANK.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEQT.TO and BANK.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer