PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEN.TO vs. XEI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEN.TO vs. XEI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF (XEN.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEN.TO achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly lower than XEI.TO's 22.21% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: XEN.TO at 12.32% and XEI.TO at 12.32%.


XEN.TO

1D
-0.09%
1M
3.24%
YTD
9.68%
6M
11.21%
1Y
34.13%
3Y*
22.90%
5Y*
15.29%
10Y*
12.32%

XEI.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
3.33%
YTD
22.21%
6M
23.56%
1Y
43.59%
3Y*
22.26%
5Y*
15.55%
10Y*
12.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEN.TO vs. XEI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XEN.TO
iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF
9.68%34.17%16.91%12.18%-3.37%28.00%-0.30%17.34%-7.93%10.65%
XEI.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF
22.21%25.96%15.42%6.69%0.41%35.88%-7.53%25.44%-10.85%7.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XEN.TO and XEI.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between XEN.TO and XEI.TO has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XEN.TO vs. XEI.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XEN.TO
XEI.TO

Financial Services

34.8%
31.4%

Energy

18.6%
32.1%

Basic Materials

18.3%
4.6%

Industrials

10.0%
0.7%

Technology

8.1%
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.3%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.1%
0.5%

Utilities

2.6%
11.2%

Communication Services

0.8%
7.6%

Real Estate

0.4%
4.8%

Healthcare

-

0.2%

Financial Services

XEN.TO
34.8%
XEI.TO
31.4%

Energy

XEN.TO
18.6%
XEI.TO
32.1%

Basic Materials

XEN.TO
18.3%
XEI.TO
4.6%

Industrials

XEN.TO
10.0%
XEI.TO
0.7%

Technology

XEN.TO
8.1%
XEI.TO
0.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XEN.TO
3.3%
XEI.TO
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

XEN.TO
3.1%
XEI.TO
0.5%

Utilities

XEN.TO
2.6%
XEI.TO
11.2%

Communication Services

XEN.TO
0.8%
XEI.TO
7.6%

Real Estate

XEN.TO
0.4%
XEI.TO
4.8%

Healthcare

XEN.TO

-

XEI.TO
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEN.TO vs. XEI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEN.TO
XEN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
XEN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XEN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

XEI.TO
XEI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XEI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEN.TO vs. XEI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF (XEN.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEN.TOXEI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

2.27

-0.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.01

19.53

-15.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.09

66.28

-48.19

XEN.TO vs. XEI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is lower than the XEI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 6.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEN.TO and XEI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEN.TOXEI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79

6.08

-3.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

1.39

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.77

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.67

-0.23

Drawdowns

XEN.TO vs. XEI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEN.TO drawdown since its inception was -49.69%, which is greater than XEI.TO's maximum drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEN.TO and XEI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEN.TOXEI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.69%

-45.51%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-2.24%

-6.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

-9.92%

-3.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.79%

-17.32%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.24%

-45.51%

+9.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.76%

+0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.65%

-5.05%

-2.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

0.66%

+1.23%

Volatility

XEN.TO vs. XEI.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF (XEN.TO) is 2.49%, while iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF (XEI.TO) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that XEN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEN.TOXEI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

2.87%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

6.01%

+3.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.30%

7.21%

+5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

11.24%

+2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.07%

16.01%

-0.94%

XEN.TO vs. XEI.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEN.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XEI.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

XEN.TO vs. XEI.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than XEI.TO's 3.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEI.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index ETF
3.56%4.39%5.56%5.08%4.78%3.65%5.13%4.71%5.53%4.37%4.51%5.75%
XEN.TO
iShares Jantzi Social Index ETF
1.69%1.83%2.29%2.46%2.60%1.73%3.72%2.13%2.31%1.75%2.07%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEN.TO and XEI.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEI.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEI.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for XEN.TO.

XEN.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while XEI.TO tracks S&P/TSX Composite High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for XEN.TO and 0.22% for XEI.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEN.TO and XEI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer