XEML vs. FLEH
XEML (Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF) and FLEH (Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - XEML tracks the STOXX Europe Total Market Leaders Index while FLEH tracks the FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XEML charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLEH.
Performance
XEML vs. FLEH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEML achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than FLEH's 4.89% return.
XEML
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -1.97%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLEH
- 1D
- -2.19%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- YTD
- 4.89%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- 16.16%
- 3Y*
- 16.00%
- 5Y*
- 11.52%
- 10Y*
- —
XEML vs. FLEH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XEML Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF | 1.49% | -0.42% |
FLEH Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF | 4.89% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEML and FLEH is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEML vs. FLEH — Risk / Return Rank
XEML
FLEH
XEML vs. FLEH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF (XEML) and Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF (FLEH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XEML | FLEH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.56 | -0.43 |
Drawdowns
XEML vs. FLEH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEML drawdown since its inception was -13.49%, smaller than the maximum FLEH drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEML and FLEH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEML | FLEH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.49% | -33.94% | +20.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.81% | -2.79% | -4.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.93% | -4.71% | -0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.69% | — |
Volatility
XEML vs. FLEH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEML | FLEH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.83% | 17.18% | +2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.83% | 16.36% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.83% | 18.26% | +1.57% |
XEML vs. FLEH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEML has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLEH's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
XEML vs. FLEH - Dividend Comparison
XEML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than FLEH's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLEH Franklin FTSE Europe Hedged ETF | 2.12% | 2.22% | 3.18% | 3.25% | 21.45% | 3.03% | 1.94% | 6.06% | 12.17% | 0.07% |
XEML Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, XEML and FLEH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FLEH is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLEH is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XEML.
FLEH has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.10% for XEML.
XEML tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Leaders Index, while FLEH tracks FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XEML and 0.09% for FLEH.
Find the right allocation for XEML and FLEH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer