PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEML vs. BBEU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEML vs. BBEU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF (XEML) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEML achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly lower than BBEU's 4.65% return.


XEML

1D
-1.83%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBEU

1D
-1.99%
1M
-2.30%
YTD
4.65%
6M
7.78%
1Y
16.49%
3Y*
16.23%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEML vs. BBEU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XEML and BBEU is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2025

0.95

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEML vs. BBEU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEML

BBEU
BBEU Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BBEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBEU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BBEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEML vs. BBEU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF (XEML) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF (BBEU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XEML vs. BBEU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEMLBBEUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.46

-0.34

Drawdowns

XEML vs. BBEU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEML drawdown since its inception was -13.49%, smaller than the maximum BBEU drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEML and BBEU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEMLBBEUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.49%

-36.27%

+22.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.81%

-3.46%

-3.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.93%

-6.14%

+1.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.29%

Volatility

XEML vs. BBEU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEMLBBEUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.83%

15.64%

+4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.83%

17.51%

+2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.83%

19.33%

+0.50%

XEML vs. BBEU - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEML has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than BBEU's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

XEML vs. BBEU - Dividend Comparison

XEML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than BBEU's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BBEU
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Europe ETF
2.84%2.83%4.16%2.94%4.72%2.63%2.29%3.24%0.49%
XEML
Xtrackers Europe Market Leaders ETF
0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, XEML and BBEU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, BBEU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BBEU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XEML.

BBEU has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.10% for XEML.

XEML tracks STOXX Europe Total Market Leaders Index, while BBEU tracks Morningstar Developed Europe Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XEML and 0.09% for BBEU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEML and BBEU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer