PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEMD.DE vs. EUNM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEMD.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.DE) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XEMD.DE having a 28.81% return and EUNM.DE slightly higher at 28.89%.


XEMD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.80%
YTD
28.81%
6M
30.06%
1Y
47.33%
3Y*
21.55%
5Y*
10Y*

EUNM.DE

1D
0.65%
1M
2.55%
YTD
28.89%
6M
30.59%
1Y
48.36%
3Y*
21.84%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
10.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEMD.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XEMD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D
28.81%18.67%13.85%5.68%-14.85%-1.58%
EUNM.DE
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)
28.89%19.20%14.09%5.71%-14.48%-1.76%

Correlation

The correlation between XEMD.DE and EUNM.DE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2021

0.99

The correlation between XEMD.DE and EUNM.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEMD.DE vs. EUNM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEMD.DE
XEMD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XEMD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEMD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEMD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
XEMD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEMD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

EUNM.DE
EUNM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EUNM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUNM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEMD.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.DE) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XEMD.DEEUNM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.46

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.44

4.60

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.41

15.79

-0.38

XEMD.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEMD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the EUNM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEMD.DE and EUNM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XEMD.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEMD.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.50%, smaller than the maximum EUNM.DE drawdown of -35.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMD.DE and EUNM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEMD.DEEUNM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.50%

-35.91%

+12.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.72%

-10.47%

-0.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-19.02%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.55%

-3.88%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.15%

-10.49%

+1.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

3.05%

+0.03%

Volatility

XEMD.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D (XEMD.DE) and iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc) (EUNM.DE) have volatilities of 8.80% and 8.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEMD.DEEUNM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.80%

8.81%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.85%

16.82%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.33%

19.18%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.07%

17.04%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

18.30%

-1.23%

XEMD.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XEMD.DE and EUNM.DE have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEMD.DE vs. EUNM.DE - Dividend Comparison

XEMD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, while EUNM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EUNM.DE
iShares MSCI EM UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEMD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF 1D
1.54%1.92%3.01%2.38%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, XEMD.DE and EUNM.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEMD.DE and EUNM.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

XEMD.DE tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while EUNM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEMD.DE and EUNM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer