XEMC.TO vs. XETM.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (XEMC.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Energy Transition Materials Index ETF (XETM.TO).
XEMC.TO and XETM.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XEMC.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index (Net). It was launched on Feb 7, 2023. XETM.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P/TSX Energy Transition Materials Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2023. Both XEMC.TO and XETM.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XEMC.TO vs. XETM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XEMC.TO vs. XETM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XEMC.TO iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 9.76% | 28.28% | 10.87% | 6.73% |
XETM.TO iShares S&P/TSX Energy Transition Materials Index ETF | 9.99% | 74.97% | 5.16% | -2.24% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XEMC.TO having a 9.76% return and XETM.TO slightly higher at 9.99%.
XEMC.TO
- 1D
- 4.21%
- 1M
- -8.58%
- YTD
- 9.76%
- 6M
- 18.13%
- 1Y
- 41.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XETM.TO
- 1D
- 7.04%
- 1M
- -14.74%
- YTD
- 9.99%
- 6M
- 32.73%
- 1Y
- 87.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XEMC.TO vs. XETM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEMC.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than XETM.TO's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XEMC.TO vs. XETM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XEMC.TO
XETM.TO
XEMC.TO vs. XETM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (XEMC.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Energy Transition Materials Index ETF (XETM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XEMC.TO | XETM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.11 | 2.00 | +0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.75 | 2.60 | +0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.44 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 3.20 | -0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.76 | 9.63 | +2.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XEMC.TO | XETM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.11 | 2.00 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.35 | 0.89 | +0.46 |
Correlation
The correlation between XEMC.TO and XETM.TO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
XEMC.TO vs. XETM.TO - Dividend Comparison
XEMC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than XETM.TO's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XEMC.TO iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 2.26% | 2.48% | 2.28% | 1.67% |
XETM.TO iShares S&P/TSX Energy Transition Materials Index ETF | 0.60% | 0.66% | 0.69% | 0.48% |
Drawdowns
XEMC.TO vs. XETM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEMC.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.55%, smaller than the maximum XETM.TO drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMC.TO and XETM.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEMC.TO | XETM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.55% | -33.71% | +19.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.12% | -27.26% | +14.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.46% | -15.12% | +5.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.22% | -8.16% | +5.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | 9.06% | -5.50% |
Volatility
XEMC.TO vs. XETM.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (XEMC.TO) is 11.60%, while iShares S&P/TSX Energy Transition Materials Index ETF (XETM.TO) has a volatility of 16.65%. This indicates that XEMC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XETM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XEMC.TO | XETM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.60% | 16.65% | -5.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.49% | 31.05% | -15.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.90% | 43.84% | -23.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 34.70% | -20.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.61% | 34.70% | -20.09% |