XEMC.TO vs. VVL.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (XEMC.TO) and Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO).

XEMC.TO and VVL.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XEMC.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index (Net). It was launched on Feb 7, 2023. VVL.TO is an actively managed fund by Vanguard. It was launched on Jun 14, 2016.

Performance

XEMC.TO vs. VVL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (XEMC.TO) and Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XEMC.TO vs. VVL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XEMC.TO iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	9.76%	28.28%	10.87%	12.07%
VVL.TO Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD	3.80%	21.53%	14.96%	6.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEMC.TO achieves a 9.76% return, which is significantly higher than VVL.TO's 3.80% return.

XEMC.TO

• 1D: 4.21%
• 1M: -8.58%
• YTD: 9.76%
• 6M: 18.13%
• 1Y: 41.69%
• 3Y*: 20.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VVL.TO

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -3.64%
• YTD: 3.80%
• 6M: 8.67%
• 1Y: 24.81%
• 3Y*: 18.53%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEMC.TO vs. VVL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEMC.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than VVL.TO's 0.38% expense ratio.

VVL.TO

Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD

XEMC.TO

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF

Return for Risk

XEMC.TO vs. VVL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEMC.TO

XEMC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 91
XEMC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
XEMC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
XEMC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
XEMC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
XEMC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

VVL.TO

VVL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 72
VVL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
VVL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
VVL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 73
VVL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
VVL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEMC.TO vs. VVL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (XEMC.TO) and Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XEMC.TO	VVL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	1.26	+0.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	1.77	+0.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.26	+0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	1.79	+1.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.76	7.07	+4.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XEMC.TO vs. VVL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEMC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the VVL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEMC.TO and VVL.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XEMC.TO	VVL.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	1.26	+0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.35	0.63	+0.73

Correlation

The correlation between XEMC.TO and VVL.TO is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XEMC.TO vs. VVL.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEMC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than VVL.TO's 1.82% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
XEMC.TO iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF	2.26%	2.48%	2.28%	1.67%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VVL.TO Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD	1.82%	1.89%	2.19%	2.65%	2.52%	1.48%	1.67%	2.60%	2.11%	1.33%	0.59%

Drawdowns

XEMC.TO vs. VVL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEMC.TO drawdown since its inception was -14.55%, smaller than the maximum VVL.TO drawdown of -43.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEMC.TO and VVL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XEMC.TO	VVL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.55%	-43.93%	+29.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.12%	-14.38%	+1.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.46%	-4.83%	-4.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.22%	-5.79%	+3.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.56%	3.63%	-0.07%

Volatility

XEMC.TO vs. VVL.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (XEMC.TO) has a higher volatility of 11.60% compared to Vanguard Global Value Factor ETF CAD (VVL.TO) at 5.32%. This indicates that XEMC.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VVL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XEMC.TO	VVL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.60%	5.32%	+6.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.49%	10.48%	+5.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.90%	19.82%	+0.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.61%	16.08%	-1.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.61%	18.85%	-4.24%