PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEIN.DE vs. XTIP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEIN.DE vs. XTIP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XEIN.DE) and Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XTIP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEIN.DE achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly lower than XTIP.DE's 3.85% return.


XEIN.DE

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.08%
6M
3.38%
YTD
2.96%
1Y
2.36%
3Y*
1.98%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
1.42%

XTIP.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.11%
6M
3.74%
YTD
3.85%
1Y
6.37%
3Y*
2.10%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEIN.DE vs. XTIP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XEIN.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
2.96%0.88%-0.23%5.58%2.21%
XTIP.DE
Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C
3.85%-5.01%7.81%0.02%-6.86%

Correlation

The correlation between XEIN.DE and XTIP.DE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2022

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between XEIN.DE and XTIP.DE has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEIN.DE vs. XTIP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEIN.DE
XEIN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XEIN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEIN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEIN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XEIN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEIN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

XTIP.DE
XTIP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
XTIP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTIP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTIP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
XTIP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTIP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEIN.DE vs. XTIP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XEIN.DE) and Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XTIP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XEIN.DEXTIP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.20

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.68

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

4.33

-0.92

XEIN.DE vs. XTIP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEIN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the XTIP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEIN.DE and XTIP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XEIN.DE vs. XTIP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.30%, which is greater than XTIP.DE's maximum drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEIN.DE and XTIP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEIN.DEXTIP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.30%

-10.79%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.91%

-3.81%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.33%

-10.79%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.80%

-4.86%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-5.82%

+1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

1.47%

-0.78%

Volatility

XEIN.DE vs. XTIP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XEIN.DE) is 0.88%, while Xtrackers II TIPS US Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XTIP.DE) has a volatility of 1.37%. This indicates that XEIN.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTIP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEIN.DEXTIP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

1.37%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

4.06%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

5.92%

-2.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.75%

7.57%

-0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.15%

7.57%

-1.42%

XEIN.DE vs. XTIP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEIN.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XTIP.DE's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEIN.DE vs. XTIP.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XEIN.DE nor XTIP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XEIN.DE and XTIP.DE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XTIP.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XTIP.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XEIN.DE.

XEIN.DE tracks iBoxx Euro Inflation-Linked Index, while XTIP.DE tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XEIN.DE and 0.07% for XTIP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEIN.DE and XTIP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer