PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEIN.DE vs. LYQ7.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEIN.DE vs. LYQ7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XEIN.DE) and Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XEIN.DE having a 2.96% return and LYQ7.DE slightly higher at 3.07%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XEIN.DE having a 1.42% annualized return and LYQ7.DE not far ahead at 1.47%.


XEIN.DE

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.08%
6M
3.38%
YTD
2.96%
1Y
2.36%
3Y*
1.98%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
1.42%

LYQ7.DE

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.13%
6M
3.53%
YTD
3.07%
1Y
2.40%
3Y*
2.03%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
1.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEIN.DE vs. LYQ7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XEIN.DE
Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)
2.96%0.88%-0.23%5.58%-9.52%6.29%2.73%6.38%-1.48%1.02%
LYQ7.DE
Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF Acc
3.07%0.95%-0.33%5.62%-9.46%6.28%2.86%6.51%-1.49%1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between XEIN.DE and LYQ7.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008

0.81

The correlation between XEIN.DE and LYQ7.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.93 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEIN.DE vs. LYQ7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEIN.DE
XEIN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XEIN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEIN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEIN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XEIN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEIN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

LYQ7.DE
LYQ7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
LYQ7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYQ7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYQ7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
LYQ7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYQ7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEIN.DE vs. LYQ7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XEIN.DE) and Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XEIN.DELYQ7.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.12

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

1.17

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

3.52

-0.10

XEIN.DE vs. LYQ7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEIN.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is comparable to the LYQ7.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEIN.DE and LYQ7.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XEIN.DE vs. LYQ7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.30%, roughly equal to the maximum LYQ7.DE drawdown of -16.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEIN.DE and LYQ7.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEIN.DELYQ7.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.30%

-16.09%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.91%

-2.04%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.33%

-5.31%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.30%

-16.09%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.30%

-16.09%

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.80%

-5.65%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-3.71%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.69%

0.68%

+0.01%

Volatility

XEIN.DE vs. LYQ7.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XEIN.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.88% compared to Amundi Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF Acc (LYQ7.DE) at 0.78%. This indicates that XEIN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYQ7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEIN.DELYQ7.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

0.78%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

2.84%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

3.74%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.75%

6.69%

+0.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.15%

5.81%

+0.34%

XEIN.DE vs. LYQ7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEIN.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LYQ7.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEIN.DE vs. LYQ7.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XEIN.DE nor LYQ7.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XEIN.DE and LYQ7.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYQ7.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYQ7.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XEIN.DE.

XEIN.DE tracks iBoxx Euro Inflation-Linked Index, while LYQ7.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XEIN.DE and 0.09% for LYQ7.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEIN.DE and LYQ7.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer