XEIN.DE vs. IBCI.DE
XEIN.DE (Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc)) and IBCI.DE (iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - XEIN.DE tracks the iBoxx Euro Inflation-Linked Index while IBCI.DE tracks the Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XEIN.DE returned 1.42%/yr vs 1.42%/yr for IBCI.DE. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XEIN.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IBCI.DE.
Performance
XEIN.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XEIN.DE having a 2.96% return and IBCI.DE slightly higher at 2.98%. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: XEIN.DE at 1.42% and IBCI.DE at 1.42%.
XEIN.DE
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 2.96%
- 1Y
- 2.36%
- 3Y*
- 1.98%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- 1.42%
IBCI.DE
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 3.28%
- YTD
- 2.98%
- 1Y
- 2.36%
- 3Y*
- 1.99%
- 5Y*
- 0.64%
- 10Y*
- 1.42%
XEIN.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEIN.DE Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) | 2.96% | 0.88% | -0.23% | 5.58% | -9.52% | 6.29% | 2.73% | 6.38% | -1.48% | 1.02% |
IBCI.DE iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF | 2.98% | 0.81% | -0.17% | 5.41% | -9.30% | 6.19% | 2.83% | 6.31% | -1.54% | 1.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEIN.DE and IBCI.DE is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | 0.79 |
The correlation between XEIN.DE and IBCI.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (all time) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEIN.DE vs. IBCI.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XEIN.DE
IBCI.DE
XEIN.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XEIN.DE) and iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XEIN.DE | IBCI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.11 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 3.32 | +0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XEIN.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEIN.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.30%, roughly equal to the maximum IBCI.DE drawdown of -16.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEIN.DE and IBCI.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEIN.DE | IBCI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.30% | -16.37% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.91% | -1.87% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.33% | -5.34% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.30% | -16.37% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.30% | -16.37% | +0.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.80% | -5.69% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -3.77% | -0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.69% | 0.70% | -0.01% |
Volatility
XEIN.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers II Eurozone Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF (Acc) (XEIN.DE) has a higher volatility of 0.88% compared to iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) at 0.77%. This indicates that XEIN.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBCI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEIN.DE | IBCI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | 0.77% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | 2.97% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67% | 3.73% | -0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.75% | 6.85% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.15% | 6.15% | 0.00% |
XEIN.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEIN.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IBCI.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XEIN.DE vs. IBCI.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XEIN.DE nor IBCI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XEIN.DE and IBCI.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBCI.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBCI.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XEIN.DE.
XEIN.DE tracks iBoxx Euro Inflation-Linked Index, while IBCI.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XEIN.DE and 0.09% for IBCI.DE.
Find the right allocation for XEIN.DE and IBCI.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer