PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XEH.TO vs. ZGQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XEH.TO vs. ZGQ.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XEH.TO (iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and ZGQ.TO (BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XEH.TO is a Europe Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Eur GR CAD, while ZGQ.TO is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World High Quality Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XEH.TO returned 9.71%/yr vs 15.07%/yr for ZGQ.TO. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XEH.TO charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for ZGQ.TO.

Performance

XEH.TO vs. ZGQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XEH.TO) and BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF (ZGQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEH.TO achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly lower than ZGQ.TO's 13.23% return. Over the past 10 years, XEH.TO has underperformed ZGQ.TO with an annualized return of 9.71%, while ZGQ.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.07% annualized return.

XEH.TO

1D
-0.65%
1M
3.95%
YTD
6.64%
6M
8.79%
1Y
15.55%
3Y*
13.05%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
9.71%

ZGQ.TO

1D
-0.05%
1M
6.84%
YTD
13.23%
6M
8.19%
1Y
25.52%
3Y*
20.50%
5Y*
13.96%
10Y*
15.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEH.TO vs. ZGQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XEH.TO
iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		6.64%20.43%7.72%15.86%-8.29%21.75%-2.39%26.24%-9.67%15.64%
ZGQ.TO
BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF		13.23%8.04%29.47%29.38%-18.76%21.44%22.41%28.91%-0.12%19.54%

Correlation

The correlation between XEH.TO and ZGQ.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2014

0.55

The correlation between XEH.TO and ZGQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XEH.TO vs. ZGQ.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XEH.TO
ZGQ.TO

Financial Services

20.8%
7.5%

Industrials

16.1%
11.2%

Healthcare

10.9%
13.4%

Technology

8.7%
38.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
4.0%

Basic Materials

5.4%
2.2%

Energy

4.1%
0.4%

Utilities

3.7%
0.2%

Communication Services

3.4%
13.3%

Real Estate

1.4%
0.3%

Financial Services

XEH.TO
20.8%
ZGQ.TO
7.5%

Industrials

XEH.TO
16.1%
ZGQ.TO
11.2%

Healthcare

XEH.TO
10.9%
ZGQ.TO
13.4%

Technology

XEH.TO
8.7%
ZGQ.TO
38.4%

Consumer Defensive

XEH.TO
8.2%
ZGQ.TO
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XEH.TO
6.7%
ZGQ.TO
4.0%

Basic Materials

XEH.TO
5.4%
ZGQ.TO
2.2%

Energy

XEH.TO
4.1%
ZGQ.TO
0.4%

Utilities

XEH.TO
3.7%
ZGQ.TO
0.2%

Communication Services

XEH.TO
3.4%
ZGQ.TO
13.3%

Real Estate

XEH.TO
1.4%
ZGQ.TO
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)

BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF

Often compared with XEH.TO:
XEH.TO vs. XEU.TOXEH.TO vs. XEF.TOXEH.TO vs. VEF.TOXEH.TO vs. IWYXEH.TO vs. IEURXEH.TO vs. XEQT.TOXEH.TO vs. ZEA.TO
Often compared with ZGQ.TO:
ZGQ.TO vs. XEQT.TOZGQ.TO vs. XWD.TOZGQ.TO vs. ZUQ.TOZGQ.TO vs. VFV.TOZGQ.TO vs. XAW.TOZGQ.TO vs. ZNQ.TOZGQ.TO vs. VOO

Return for Risk

XEH.TO vs. ZGQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XEH.TO
XEH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XEH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
XEH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
ZGQ.TO
ZGQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
ZGQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZGQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZGQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
ZGQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZGQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEH.TO vs. ZGQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XEH.TO) and BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF (ZGQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XEH.TOZGQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.24
1.83

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.80
2.57

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.34

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

2.78

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.13

11.30

-5.17

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XEH.TO vs. ZGQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the ZGQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEH.TO and ZGQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XEH.TOZGQ.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

1.83

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.89

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.94

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.93

-0.38

Drawdowns

XEH.TO vs. ZGQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEH.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.81%, which is greater than ZGQ.TO's maximum drawdown of -26.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEH.TO and ZGQ.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XEH.TOZGQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.81%

-26.68%

-9.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.38%

-9.22%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.01%

-18.36%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.34%

-26.68%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.81%

-26.68%

-9.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-1.17%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.88%

-4.49%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

2.27%

+0.27%

Volatility

XEH.TO vs. ZGQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XEH.TO) and BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF (ZGQ.TO) have volatilities of 4.79% and 4.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XEH.TOZGQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.79%

4.57%

+0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.44%

11.49%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.62%

14.04%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.07%

15.83%

-1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.89%

16.15%

-0.26%

XEH.TO vs. ZGQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEH.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than ZGQ.TO's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XEH.TO vs. ZGQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than ZGQ.TO's 0.49% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEH.TO
iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)		2.35%2.50%2.71%2.98%3.13%2.39%1.98%3.48%3.35%2.19%2.35%2.24%
ZGQ.TO
BMO MSCI All Country World High Quality Index ETF		0.49%0.60%0.90%1.33%1.34%0.86%0.99%1.10%1.51%1.09%1.35%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

XEH.TO and ZGQ.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEH.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEH.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ZGQ.TO.

XEH.TO is categorized as Europe Equities, while ZGQ.TO is Global Equities. XEH.TO tracks Morningstar Eur GR CAD, while ZGQ.TO tracks MSCI All Country World High Quality Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for XEH.TO and 0.50% for ZGQ.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEH.TO and ZGQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer