XEH.TO vs. SDAY.NEO
XEH.TO (iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) and SDAY.NEO (Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XEH.TO is a Europe Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Eur GR CAD, while SDAY.NEO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Hamilton Capital. XEH.TO is passively managed, while SDAY.NEO is actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XEH.TO charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for SDAY.NEO.
Performance
XEH.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEH.TO achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly lower than SDAY.NEO's 9.14% return.
XEH.TO
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 3.95%
- YTD
- 6.64%
- 6M
- 8.79%
- 1Y
- 15.55%
- 3Y*
- 13.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.71%
SDAY.NEO
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 3.97%
- YTD
- 9.14%
- 6M
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XEH.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XEH.TO iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 6.64% | 7.99% |
SDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF | 9.14% | 4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEH.TO and SDAY.NEO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEH.TO vs. SDAY.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
XEH.TO
SDAY.NEO
XEH.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XEH.TO) and Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF (SDAY.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XEH.TO | SDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.13 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XEH.TO | SDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 1.39 | -0.84 |
Drawdowns
XEH.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEH.TO drawdown since its inception was -35.81%, which is greater than SDAY.NEO's maximum drawdown of -7.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEH.TO and SDAY.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEH.TO | SDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.81% | -7.75% | -28.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.81% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.11% | -1.27% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -1.86% | -3.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | — | — |
Volatility
XEH.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEH.TO | SDAY.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.44% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 11.55% | +1.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.07% | 11.55% | +2.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.89% | 11.55% | +4.34% |
XEH.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEH.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than SDAY.NEO's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
XEH.TO vs. SDAY.NEO - Dividend Comparison
XEH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than SDAY.NEO's 16.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDAY.NEO Hamilton Enhanced U.S. Equity DayMAX™ ETF | 16.28% | 8.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XEH.TO iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 2.35% | 2.50% | 2.71% | 2.98% | 3.13% | 2.39% | 1.98% | 3.48% | 3.35% | 2.19% | 2.35% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEH.TO and SDAY.NEO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEH.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEH.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SDAY.NEO.
XEH.TO is categorized as Europe Equities, while SDAY.NEO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Hamilton Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for XEH.TO and 0.85% for SDAY.NEO.
Find the right allocation for XEH.TO and SDAY.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer