PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEG.TO vs. XTLH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEG.TO vs. XTLH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) and iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XTLH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEG.TO achieves a 34.92% return, which is significantly higher than XTLH.TO's -0.61% return.


XEG.TO

1D
-2.61%
1M
-8.19%
YTD
34.92%
6M
35.69%
1Y
47.18%
3Y*
25.66%
5Y*
27.13%
10Y*
11.38%

XTLH.TO

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.76%
YTD
-0.61%
6M
-0.52%
1Y
2.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEG.TO vs. XTLH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF
34.92%16.72%14.04%-0.89%
XTLH.TO
iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
-0.61%2.61%-9.55%-1.06%

Correlation

The correlation between XEG.TO and XTLH.TO is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2023

-0.14

The correlation between XEG.TO and XTLH.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to -0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEG.TO vs. XTLH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEG.TO
XEG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

XTLH.TO
XTLH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
XTLH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTLH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTLH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
XTLH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTLH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEG.TO vs. XTLH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) and iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XTLH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XEG.TOXTLH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.05

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

0.26

+4.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.99

0.63

+11.35

XEG.TO vs. XTLH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the XTLH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEG.TO and XTLH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XEG.TO vs. XTLH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEG.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.51%, which is greater than XTLH.TO's maximum drawdown of -15.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEG.TO and XTLH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEG.TOXTLH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.51%

-15.86%

-71.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-8.37%

-2.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.27%

-11.50%

+1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.55%

-9.14%

-25.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

3.49%

+0.46%

Volatility

XEG.TO vs. XTLH.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.33% compared to iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XTLH.TO) at 3.04%. This indicates that XEG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTLH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEG.TOXTLH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.33%

3.04%

+6.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.83%

6.56%

+13.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.32%

9.51%

+13.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.75%

12.41%

+16.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.42%

12.41%

+21.01%

XEG.TO vs. XTLH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEG.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XTLH.TO's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

XEG.TO vs. XTLH.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than XTLH.TO's 4.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF
2.84%3.63%3.46%4.26%3.31%1.64%2.96%2.70%2.25%1.41%1.40%3.58%
XTLH.TO
iShares 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
4.60%4.42%4.32%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEG.TO and XTLH.TO have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XTLH.TO is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XTLH.TO is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XEG.TO.

XEG.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while XTLH.TO is Government Bonds. XEG.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index, while XTLH.TO tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (CAD-Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XEG.TO and 0.18% for XTLH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEG.TO and XTLH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer