XEG.TO vs. XIT.TO
XEG.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF) and XIT.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XEG.TO is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index, while XIT.TO is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XEG.TO returned 11.69%/yr vs 17.72%/yr for XIT.TO. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XEG.TO charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XIT.TO.
Performance
XEG.TO vs. XIT.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEG.TO achieves a 38.53% return, which is significantly higher than XIT.TO's -7.03% return. Over the past 10 years, XEG.TO has underperformed XIT.TO with an annualized return of 11.69%, while XIT.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.72% annualized return.
XEG.TO
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -2.76%
- YTD
- 38.53%
- 6M
- 37.54%
- 1Y
- 55.84%
- 3Y*
- 26.37%
- 5Y*
- 28.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.69%
XIT.TO
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- 13.98%
- YTD
- -7.03%
- 6M
- -8.75%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- 17.72%
XEG.TO vs. XIT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF | 38.53% | 16.72% | 14.04% | 3.55% | 53.25% | 83.71% | -34.44% | 9.04% | -27.05% | -11.17% |
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | -7.03% | 15.48% | 30.02% | 55.56% | -35.85% | 10.74% | 45.91% | 60.88% | 11.71% | 17.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEG.TO and XIT.TO is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.23 |
The correlation between XEG.TO and XIT.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XEG.TO vs. XIT.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XEG.TO
XIT.TO
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XEG.TO
XIT.TO
-
Basic Materials
XEG.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Communication Services
XEG.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
XEG.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
XEG.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Financial Services
XEG.TO
-
XIT.TO
Healthcare
XEG.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Industrials
XEG.TO
-
XIT.TO
Real Estate
XEG.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Technology
XEG.TO
-
XIT.TO
Utilities
XEG.TO
-
XIT.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEG.TO vs. XIT.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XEG.TO
XIT.TO
XEG.TO vs. XIT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XEG.TO | XIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.06 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.04 | 0.18 | +4.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.38 | 0.36 | +14.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XEG.TO vs. XIT.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEG.TO drawdown since its inception was -87.51%, which is greater than XIT.TO's maximum drawdown of -56.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEG.TO and XIT.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEG.TO | XIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.51% | -56.92% | -30.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.12% | -31.93% | +20.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.67% | -31.93% | +6.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.42% | -54.15% | +25.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -79.66% | -54.15% | -25.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.87% | -17.01% | +9.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.55% | -16.91% | -17.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 15.98% | -12.09% |
Volatility
XEG.TO vs. XIT.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) is 9.11%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT.TO) has a volatility of 10.65%. This indicates that XEG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEG.TO | XIT.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.11% | 10.65% | -1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.65% | 24.63% | -4.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.30% | 31.61% | -8.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.72% | 29.43% | -0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.40% | 28.56% | +4.84% |
XEG.TO vs. XIT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEG.TO has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than XIT.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XEG.TO vs. XIT.TO - Dividend Comparison
XEG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, while XIT.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEG.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF | 2.76% | 3.63% | 3.46% | 4.26% | 3.31% | 1.64% | 2.96% | 2.70% | 2.25% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 3.58% |
XIT.TO iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEG.TO and XIT.TO have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XIT.TO is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XIT.TO is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XEG.TO.
XEG.TO is categorized as Energy Equities, while XIT.TO is Technology Equities. XEG.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index, while XIT.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for XEG.TO and 0.60% for XIT.TO.
Find the right allocation for XEG.TO and XIT.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer