XEF-U.TO vs. XQQ.TO
XEF-U.TO (iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF) and XQQ.TO (iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)) are both exchange-traded funds - XEF-U.TO is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE® Investable Market Index, while XQQ.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Morningstar US Market TR CAD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XEF-U.TO returned 7.17%/yr vs 12.13%/yr for XQQ.TO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XEF-U.TO charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XQQ.TO.
Performance
XEF-U.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XEF-U.TO is traded in USD, while XQQ.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XQQ.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XEF-U.TO achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than XQQ.TO's 18.33% return.
XEF-U.TO
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 10.90%
- 1Y
- 20.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- —
XQQ.TO
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 8.38%
- YTD
- 18.33%
- 6M
- 18.52%
- 1Y
- 36.72%
- 3Y*
- 25.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.13%
- 10Y*
- 18.84%
XEF-U.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEF-U.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF | 8.45% | 31.24% | 2.23% | 15.90% | -15.58% | 10.81% | 10.61% | 1.79% |
XQQ.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 18.33% | 24.05% | 14.41% | 55.69% | -38.11% | 23.20% | 48.13% | 9.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between XEF-U.TO and XQQ.TO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2019 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, XEF-U.TO and XQQ.TO have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.34, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XEF-U.TO vs. XQQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank
XEF-U.TO
XQQ.TO
XEF-U.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XEF-U.TO | XQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.36 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 2.58 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.90 | 10.16 | -3.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XEF-U.TO | XQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 2.12 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.47 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.62 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
XEF-U.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XEF-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, smaller than the maximum XQQ.TO drawdown of -43.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEF-U.TO and XQQ.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XEF-U.TO | XQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.72% | -43.99% | +10.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.67% | -14.32% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.48% | -23.03% | +9.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.18% | -43.99% | +12.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -0.67% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.61% | -8.06% | +2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.03% | 3.63% | -0.60% |
Volatility
XEF-U.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XQQ.TO) have volatilities of 5.01% and 4.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XEF-U.TO | XQQ.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.01% | 4.80% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.61% | 13.31% | -0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.24% | 17.43% | -2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.28% | 25.73% | -4.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.41% | 25.53% | -1.12% |
XEF-U.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XEF-U.TO has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than XQQ.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
XEF-U.TO vs. XQQ.TO - Dividend Comparison
XEF-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than XQQ.TO's 0.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XEF-U.TO iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF | 1.63% | 1.77% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 2.27% | 1.94% | 1.41% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XQQ.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) | 0.21% | 0.25% | 0.32% | 0.31% | 0.43% | 0.17% | 0.26% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.53% | 0.76% | 0.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XEF-U.TO and XQQ.TO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XEF-U.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XEF-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XQQ.TO.
XEF-U.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while XQQ.TO is Nasdaq-100. XEF-U.TO tracks MSCI EAFE® Investable Market Index, while XQQ.TO tracks Morningstar US Market TR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for XEF-U.TO and 0.39% for XQQ.TO.
Find the right allocation for XEF-U.TO and XQQ.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer