PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XEF-U.TO vs. XAW.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XEF-U.TO vs. XAW.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO) and iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XEF-U.TO is traded in USD, while XAW.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XAW.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XEF-U.TO achieves a 8.45% return, which is significantly lower than XAW.TO's 13.24% return.


XEF-U.TO

1D
-0.76%
1M
3.58%
YTD
8.45%
6M
10.90%
1Y
20.77%
3Y*
15.95%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*

XAW.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
5.89%
YTD
13.24%
6M
14.10%
1Y
29.94%
3Y*
20.68%
5Y*
11.00%
10Y*
12.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XEF-U.TO vs. XAW.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XEF-U.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF
8.45%31.24%2.23%15.90%-15.58%10.81%10.61%1.79%
XAW.TO
iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF
12.29%21.42%16.33%21.14%-17.74%19.26%14.62%5.71%

Correlation

The correlation between XEF-U.TO and XAW.TO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2019

0.43

Over the past year, XEF-U.TO and XAW.TO have become more correlated (0.86) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XEF-U.TO vs. XAW.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XEF-U.TO
XEF-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
XEF-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEF-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEF-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
XEF-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEF-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

XAW.TO
XAW.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
XAW.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
XAW.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XEF-U.TO vs. XAW.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO) and iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XEF-U.TOXAW.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.42

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

3.08

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.90

13.67

-6.77

XEF-U.TO vs. XAW.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XEF-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the XAW.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XEF-U.TO and XAW.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XEF-U.TOXAW.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.33

-0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.69

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.62

+0.06

Drawdowns

XEF-U.TO vs. XAW.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XEF-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.72%, roughly equal to the maximum XAW.TO drawdown of -33.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XEF-U.TO and XAW.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XEF-U.TOXAW.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.72%

-33.88%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-9.76%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.48%

-16.57%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.18%

-26.06%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

0.00%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.61%

-5.57%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.20%

+0.83%

Volatility

XEF-U.TO vs. XAW.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF-U.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.01% compared to iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF (XAW.TO) at 4.32%. This indicates that XEF-U.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XAW.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XEF-U.TOXAW.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.01%

4.32%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.61%

10.41%

+2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.24%

12.92%

+2.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.28%

16.03%

+5.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.41%

17.36%

+7.05%

XEF-U.TO vs. XAW.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XEF-U.TO has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than XAW.TO's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XEF-U.TO vs. XAW.TO - Dividend Comparison

XEF-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than XAW.TO's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XAW.TO
iShares Core MSCI All Country World ex Canada Index ETF
1.17%1.33%1.61%1.71%1.79%1.77%1.49%2.02%2.29%1.92%1.80%1.83%
XEF-U.TO
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF
1.63%1.77%2.05%2.09%2.27%1.94%1.41%0.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XEF-U.TO and XAW.TO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XEF-U.TO is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XEF-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for XAW.TO.

XEF-U.TO tracks MSCI EAFE® Investable Market Index, while XAW.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for XEF-U.TO and 0.22% for XAW.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XEF-U.TO and XAW.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer