XECT.DE vs. IBCJ.DE
XECT.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Europe Climate Transition UCITS ETF 1C) and IBCJ.DE (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - XECT.DE tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR while IBCJ.DE tracks the MSCI Poland. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XECT.DE returned 11.71%/yr vs 30.00%/yr for IBCJ.DE. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XECT.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IBCJ.DE.
Performance
XECT.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XECT.DE achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly lower than IBCJ.DE's 16.11% return.
XECT.DE
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 6.46%
- 6M
- 9.40%
- 1Y
- 14.72%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBCJ.DE
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 6.74%
- YTD
- 16.11%
- 6M
- 26.04%
- 1Y
- 39.97%
- 3Y*
- 30.00%
- 5Y*
- 14.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
XECT.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XECT.DE Xtrackers MSCI Europe Climate Transition UCITS ETF 1C | 6.46% | 16.87% | 7.18% | 7.63% |
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 16.11% | 53.66% | -0.42% | 41.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XECT.DE and IBCJ.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023 | 0.55 |
The correlation between XECT.DE and IBCJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XECT.DE vs. IBCJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XECT.DE
IBCJ.DE
XECT.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Climate Transition UCITS ETF 1C (XECT.DE) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XECT.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.28 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 3.99 | -2.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.80 | 9.83 | -5.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XECT.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.69 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.15 | +0.76 |
Drawdowns
XECT.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XECT.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.63%, smaller than the maximum IBCJ.DE drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XECT.DE and IBCJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XECT.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.63% | -56.11% | +39.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -9.96% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.63% | -18.47% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.31% | -1.33% | -0.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -19.38% | +17.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 4.05% | -0.99% |
Volatility
XECT.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Europe Climate Transition UCITS ETF 1C (XECT.DE) is 5.02%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that XECT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XECT.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 7.93% | -2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.30% | 17.61% | -6.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.52% | 23.51% | -9.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 26.72% | -13.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.06% | 25.16% | -12.10% |
XECT.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XECT.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCJ.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
XECT.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XECT.DE nor IBCJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XECT.DE and IBCJ.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XECT.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XECT.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
XECT.DE tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR, while IBCJ.DE tracks MSCI Poland. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XECT.DE and 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for XECT.DE and IBCJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer