XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L
XDWU.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C) and XLUP.L (Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF) are both Utilities Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, from Xtrackers and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWU.L returned 8.86%/yr vs 8.47%/yr for XLUP.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDWU.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLUP.L.
Performance
XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDWU.L is traded in USD, while XLUP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLUP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWU.L achieves a 4.59% return, which is significantly higher than XLUP.L's 1.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDWU.L having a 8.86% annualized return and XLUP.L not far behind at 8.47%.
XDWU.L
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- -5.78%
- YTD
- 4.59%
- 6M
- 4.09%
- 1Y
- 14.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 8.86%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
XLUP.L
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- -6.77%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 8.48%
- 3Y*
- 12.54%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWU.L Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C | 4.59% | 26.14% | 12.54% | 0.30% | -3.57% | 10.23% | 4.86% | 24.37% | 0.63% | 15.46% |
XLUP.L Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF | 1.28% | 16.28% | 22.54% | -8.45% | 1.79% | 19.03% | -1.83% | 26.23% | 2.67% | 10.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWU.L and XLUP.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2016 | 0.73 |
The correlation between XDWU.L and XLUP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.86 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDWU.L
XLUP.L
Utilities
Industrials
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
XDWU.L
XLUP.L
Industrials
XDWU.L
XLUP.L
-
Energy
XDWU.L
XLUP.L
-
Basic Materials
XDWU.L
-
XLUP.L
-
Communication Services
XDWU.L
-
XLUP.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XDWU.L
-
XLUP.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XDWU.L
-
XLUP.L
-
Financial Services
XDWU.L
-
XLUP.L
-
Healthcare
XDWU.L
-
XLUP.L
-
Real Estate
XDWU.L
-
XLUP.L
-
Technology
XDWU.L
-
XLUP.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWU.L
XLUP.L
XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) and Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWU.L | XLUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.11 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 0.93 | +0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 2.02 | +3.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWU.L | XLUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 0.60 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.49 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.47 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.48 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, smaller than the maximum XLUP.L drawdown of -35.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWU.L and XLUP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWU.L | XLUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.87% | -35.69% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.05% | -9.07% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.56% | -18.42% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.92% | -26.05% | +4.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.87% | -35.69% | +1.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.90% | -9.07% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.47% | -6.52% | +1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 4.19% | -1.55% |
Volatility
XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) is 4.19%, while Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that XDWU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLUP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWU.L | XLUP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 4.69% | -0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 11.55% | -1.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.48% | 14.13% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.27% | 17.20% | -1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.87% | 18.20% | -0.33% |
XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLUP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWU.L nor XLUP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWU.L and XLUP.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLUP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLUP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWU.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWU.L and 0.14% for XLUP.L.
Find the right allocation for XDWU.L and XLUP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer