PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) and Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDWU.L is traded in USD, while XLUP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLUP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWU.L achieves a 4.59% return, which is significantly higher than XLUP.L's 1.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XDWU.L having a 8.86% annualized return and XLUP.L not far behind at 8.47%.


XDWU.L

1D
-1.38%
1M
-5.78%
YTD
4.59%
6M
4.09%
1Y
14.91%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
8.86%

XLUP.L

1D
-2.07%
1M
-6.77%
YTD
1.28%
6M
0.05%
1Y
8.48%
3Y*
12.54%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
8.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWU.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C
4.59%26.14%12.54%0.30%-3.57%10.23%4.86%24.37%0.63%15.46%
XLUP.L
Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF
1.28%16.28%22.54%-8.45%1.79%19.03%-1.83%26.23%2.67%10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWU.L and XLUP.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2016

0.73

The correlation between XDWU.L and XLUP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.86 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDWU.L
XLUP.L

Utilities

98.1%
100.0%

Industrials

1.4%

-

Energy

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

XDWU.L
98.1%
XLUP.L
100.0%

Industrials

XDWU.L
1.4%
XLUP.L

-

Energy

XDWU.L
0.5%
XLUP.L

-

Basic Materials

XDWU.L

-

XLUP.L

-

Communication Services

XDWU.L

-

XLUP.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

XDWU.L

-

XLUP.L

-

Consumer Defensive

XDWU.L

-

XLUP.L

-

Financial Services

XDWU.L

-

XLUP.L

-

Healthcare

XDWU.L

-

XLUP.L

-

Real Estate

XDWU.L

-

XLUP.L

-

Technology

XDWU.L

-

XLUP.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWU.L
XDWU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XDWU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

XLUP.L
XLUP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XLUP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLUP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLUP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XLUP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLUP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) and Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWU.LXLUP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.11

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

0.93

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.63

2.02

+3.61

XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the XLUP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWU.L and XLUP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWU.LXLUP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

0.60

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.49

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.47

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.48

+0.15

Drawdowns

XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, smaller than the maximum XLUP.L drawdown of -35.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWU.L and XLUP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWU.LXLUP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.87%

-35.69%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.05%

-9.07%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.56%

-18.42%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.92%

-26.05%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

-35.69%

+1.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.90%

-9.07%

+1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-6.52%

+1.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

4.19%

-1.55%

Volatility

XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) is 4.19%, while Invesco US Utilities Sector UCITS ETF (XLUP.L) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that XDWU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLUP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWU.LXLUP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

4.69%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.50%

11.55%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.48%

14.13%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

17.20%

-1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

18.20%

-0.33%

XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLUP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWU.L vs. XLUP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWU.L nor XLUP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWU.L and XLUP.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLUP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLUP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWU.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWU.L and 0.14% for XLUP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWU.L and XLUP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer