PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWU.L vs. SPYL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWU.L vs. SPYL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDWU.L is traded in USD, while SPYL.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SPYL.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XDWU.L having a 9.46% return and SPYL.DE slightly higher at 9.73%.


XDWU.L

1D
-0.30%
1M
2.39%
6M
8.54%
YTD
9.46%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
15.46%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
8.72%

SPYL.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.23%
6M
9.71%
YTD
9.73%
1Y
21.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWU.L vs. SPYL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XDWU.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C
9.46%25.35%13.23%9.56%
SPYL.DE
State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc)
9.73%18.21%24.76%12.46%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWU.L and SPYL.DE is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2023

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWU.L vs. SPYL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWU.L
XDWU.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XDWU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYL.DE
SPYL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWU.L vs. SPYL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDWU.LSPYL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.49

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.00

10.08

-4.08

XDWU.L vs. SPYL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the SPYL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWU.L and SPYL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDWU.L vs. SPYL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, which is greater than SPYL.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWU.L and SPYL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWU.LSPYL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.87%

-19.42%

-14.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.05%

-8.60%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.62%

-0.94%

-2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.28%

-1.80%

-3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.12%

+1.05%

Volatility

XDWU.L vs. SPYL.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD Unhedged (Acc) (SPYL.DE) at 3.02%. This indicates that XDWU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWU.LSPYL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

3.02%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.85%

8.73%

+2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.80%

12.11%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.15%

14.47%

+0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.63%

14.47%

+1.16%

XDWU.L vs. SPYL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYL.DE's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWU.L vs. SPYL.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWU.L nor SPYL.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWU.L and SPYL.DE have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYL.DE is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYL.DE is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWU.L.

XDWU.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while SPYL.DE is S&P 500. XDWU.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while SPYL.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWU.L and 0.03% for SPYL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWU.L and SPYL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer