PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWU.L vs. EWSP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWU.L vs. EWSP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDWU.L is traded in USD, while EWSP.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the EWSP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWU.L achieves a 4.59% return, which is significantly lower than EWSP.L's 9.33% return.


XDWU.L

1D
-1.38%
1M
-5.78%
YTD
4.59%
6M
4.09%
1Y
14.91%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
8.86%
10Y*
8.86%

EWSP.L

1D
0.46%
1M
3.89%
YTD
9.33%
6M
10.91%
1Y
19.90%
3Y*
15.19%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWU.L vs. EWSP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XDWU.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C
4.59%26.14%12.54%0.30%-3.43%
EWSP.L
iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.34%11.81%12.23%13.40%-2.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWU.L and EWSP.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2022

0.48

The correlation between XDWU.L and EWSP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDWU.L vs. EWSP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDWU.L
EWSP.L

Utilities

98.1%
5.8%

Industrials

1.4%
14.2%

Energy

0.5%
4.2%

Basic Materials

-

3.9%

Communication Services

-

4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.5%

Financial Services

-

14.3%

Healthcare

-

11.2%

Real Estate

-

6.3%

Technology

-

19.8%

Utilities

XDWU.L
98.1%
EWSP.L
5.8%

Industrials

XDWU.L
1.4%
EWSP.L
14.2%

Energy

XDWU.L
0.5%
EWSP.L
4.2%

Basic Materials

XDWU.L

-

EWSP.L
3.9%

Communication Services

XDWU.L

-

EWSP.L
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XDWU.L

-

EWSP.L
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

XDWU.L

-

EWSP.L
6.5%

Financial Services

XDWU.L

-

EWSP.L
14.3%

Healthcare

XDWU.L

-

EWSP.L
11.2%

Real Estate

XDWU.L

-

EWSP.L
6.3%

Technology

XDWU.L

-

EWSP.L
19.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWU.L vs. EWSP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWU.L
XDWU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
XDWU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

EWSP.L
EWSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EWSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
EWSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWU.L vs. EWSP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) and iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWU.LEWSP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.33

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.84

2.78

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.63

10.06

-4.43

XDWU.L vs. EWSP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWU.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the EWSP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWU.L and EWSP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWU.LEWSP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

1.91

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.80

-0.17

Drawdowns

XDWU.L vs. EWSP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.87%, which is greater than EWSP.L's maximum drawdown of -18.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWU.L and EWSP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWU.LEWSP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.87%

-18.34%

-15.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.05%

-7.11%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.56%

-18.34%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.90%

0.00%

-7.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-3.67%

-1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

1.97%

+0.67%

Volatility

XDWU.L vs. EWSP.L - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.L) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to iShares S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EWSP.L) at 2.27%. This indicates that XDWU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWSP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWU.LEWSP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.19%

2.27%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.50%

7.06%

+3.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.48%

10.39%

+2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

14.44%

+0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.87%

14.44%

+3.43%

XDWU.L vs. EWSP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWU.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than EWSP.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWU.L vs. EWSP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWU.L nor EWSP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWU.L and EWSP.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EWSP.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EWSP.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWU.L.

XDWU.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while EWSP.L is S&P 500. XDWU.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while EWSP.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWU.L and 0.20% for EWSP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWU.L and EWSP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer