XDWU.DE vs. IB1T.DE
XDWU.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C) and IB1T.DE (iShares Bitcoin ETP) are both exchange-traded funds - XDWU.DE is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while IB1T.DE is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by iShares. XDWU.DE is passively managed, while IB1T.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, XDWU.DE returned 13.84% vs -40.00% for IB1T.DE. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
XDWU.DE vs. IB1T.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWU.DE achieves a 5.92% return, which is significantly higher than IB1T.DE's -26.48% return.
XDWU.DE
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- -3.92%
- YTD
- 5.92%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 13.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.70%
- 5Y*
- 9.86%
- 10Y*
- 8.32%
IB1T.DE
- 1D
- -3.76%
- 1M
- -20.86%
- YTD
- -26.48%
- 6M
- -28.16%
- 1Y
- -40.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWU.DE vs. IB1T.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XDWU.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C | 5.92% | 8.52% |
IB1T.DE iShares Bitcoin ETP | -26.48% | -15.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWU.DE and IB1T.DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWU.DE vs. IB1T.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWU.DE
IB1T.DE
XDWU.DE vs. IB1T.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.DE) and iShares Bitcoin ETP (IB1T.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWU.DE | IB1T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.84 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | -0.82 | +2.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.77 | -1.44 | +6.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWU.DE | IB1T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | -1.02 | +2.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | -0.81 | +1.36 |
Drawdowns
XDWU.DE vs. IB1T.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWU.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum IB1T.DE drawdown of -49.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWU.DE and IB1T.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWU.DE | IB1T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.61% | -49.39% | +15.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.30% | -49.39% | +42.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.22% | -48.64% | +41.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -20.44% | +13.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 28.18% | -25.47% |
Volatility
XDWU.DE vs. IB1T.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.DE) is 4.08%, while iShares Bitcoin ETP (IB1T.DE) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that XDWU.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IB1T.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWU.DE | IB1T.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 9.86% | -5.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | 31.08% | -20.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.09% | 39.64% | -27.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.12% | 40.27% | -26.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 40.27% | -25.11% |
XDWU.DE vs. IB1T.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XDWU.DE and IB1T.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWU.DE vs. IB1T.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWU.DE nor IB1T.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWU.DE and IB1T.DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWU.DE and IB1T.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
XDWU.DE is categorized as Utilities Equities, while IB1T.DE is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares.
Find the right allocation for XDWU.DE and IB1T.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer