XDWS.DE vs. ZPDS.DE
XDWS.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C) and ZPDS.DE (SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - XDWS.DE tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while ZPDS.DE tracks the S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWS.DE returned 5.34%/yr vs 6.84%/yr for ZPDS.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDWS.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ZPDS.DE.
Performance
XDWS.DE vs. ZPDS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWS.DE achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than ZPDS.DE's 7.50% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWS.DE has underperformed ZPDS.DE with an annualized return of 5.34%, while ZPDS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 6.84% annualized return.
XDWS.DE
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 6M
- 4.20%
- 1Y
- -0.89%
- 3Y*
- 3.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.93%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
ZPDS.DE
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -2.00%
- YTD
- 7.50%
- 6M
- 7.22%
- 1Y
- 0.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.36%
- 5Y*
- 6.72%
- 10Y*
- 6.84%
XDWS.DE vs. ZPDS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWS.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C | 4.43% | -3.34% | 12.56% | -1.53% | -0.06% | 22.38% | -1.96% | 25.94% | -5.88% | 2.82% |
ZPDS.DE SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF | 7.50% | -8.90% | 20.38% | -5.08% | 5.38% | 26.65% | -0.79% | 29.96% | -4.12% | -1.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWS.DE and ZPDS.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.92 |
The correlation between XDWS.DE and ZPDS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWS.DE vs. ZPDS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWS.DE
ZPDS.DE
XDWS.DE vs. ZPDS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE) and SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWS.DE | ZPDS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.02 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 0.05 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.20 | 0.10 | -0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWS.DE | ZPDS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 | 0.03 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.50 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.49 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.48 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
XDWS.DE vs. ZPDS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWS.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, roughly equal to the maximum ZPDS.DE drawdown of -23.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWS.DE and ZPDS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWS.DE | ZPDS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.95% | -23.29% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -8.74% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.90% | -15.44% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.47% | -16.54% | +4.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.95% | -23.29% | +0.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.60% | -7.67% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -6.14% | +1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.34% | 4.27% | +0.07% |
Volatility
XDWS.DE vs. ZPDS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE) is 5.00%, while SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (ZPDS.DE) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that XDWS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPDS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWS.DE | ZPDS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 6.04% | -1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.01% | 11.46% | -1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 14.02% | -1.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.35% | 13.37% | -2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.19% | 13.98% | -1.79% |
XDWS.DE vs. ZPDS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ZPDS.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWS.DE vs. ZPDS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWS.DE nor ZPDS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, XDWS.DE and ZPDS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ZPDS.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZPDS.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWS.DE.
XDWS.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while ZPDS.DE tracks S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWS.DE and 0.15% for ZPDS.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWS.DE and ZPDS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer