PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWS.DE vs. XUCS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWS.DE vs. XUCS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XUCS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWS.DE achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than XUCS.DE's 7.99% return.


XDWS.DE

1D
-0.24%
1M
-1.84%
YTD
4.43%
6M
4.20%
1Y
-0.89%
3Y*
3.32%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
5.34%

XUCS.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
7.99%
6M
7.83%
1Y
0.97%
3Y*
5.59%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWS.DE vs. XUCS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWS.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C
4.43%-3.34%12.56%-1.53%-0.06%22.38%-1.96%25.94%-5.88%3.63%
XUCS.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D
7.99%-7.97%21.47%-1.77%5.50%27.57%-0.49%29.85%-4.67%4.10%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWS.DE and XUCS.DE is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2017

0.93

The correlation between XDWS.DE and XUCS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWS.DE vs. XUCS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWS.DE
XDWS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XDWS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

XUCS.DE
XUCS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XUCS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUCS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUCS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XUCS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUCS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWS.DE vs. XUCS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XUCS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWS.DEXUCS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.02

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

0.12

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.20

0.23

-0.44

XDWS.DE vs. XUCS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWS.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the XUCS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWS.DE and XUCS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWS.DEXUCS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

0.07

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.60

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.59

-0.14

Drawdowns

XDWS.DE vs. XUCS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWS.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, roughly equal to the maximum XUCS.DE drawdown of -23.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWS.DE and XUCS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWS.DEXUCS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.95%

-23.46%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-8.36%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.90%

-15.64%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.47%

-15.64%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.60%

-7.31%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-5.50%

+0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

4.17%

+0.17%

Volatility

XDWS.DE vs. XUCS.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE) is 5.00%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D (XUCS.DE) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that XDWS.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUCS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWS.DEXUCS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

6.10%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

11.47%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.06%

14.08%

-2.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.35%

13.41%

-2.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.19%

14.50%

-2.31%

XDWS.DE vs. XUCS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWS.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XUCS.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWS.DE vs. XUCS.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDWS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUCS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
XDWS.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUCS.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1D
1.94%2.17%2.09%3.35%3.11%1.88%3.02%2.37%0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, XDWS.DE and XUCS.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XUCS.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUCS.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWS.DE.

XDWS.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while XUCS.DE tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWS.DE and 0.12% for XUCS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWS.DE and XUCS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer