PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWS.DE vs. XDWU.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWS.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWS.DE achieves a 4.43% return, which is significantly lower than XDWU.DE's 5.92% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWS.DE has underperformed XDWU.DE with an annualized return of 5.34%, while XDWU.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.32% annualized return.


XDWS.DE

1D
-0.24%
1M
-2.22%
YTD
4.43%
6M
3.49%
1Y
0.24%
3Y*
3.32%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
5.34%

XDWU.DE

1D
-1.48%
1M
-3.92%
YTD
5.92%
6M
5.19%
1Y
13.84%
3Y*
11.70%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
8.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWS.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDWS.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C
4.43%-3.34%12.56%-1.53%-0.06%22.38%-1.96%25.94%-5.88%2.82%
XDWU.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C
5.92%11.38%19.82%-3.19%2.23%19.80%-4.88%25.27%6.79%-0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWS.DE and XDWU.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between XDWS.DE and XDWU.DE has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWS.DE vs. XDWU.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWS.DE
XDWS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
XDWS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWU.DE
XDWU.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XDWU.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWU.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWU.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWU.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWU.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWS.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWS.DEXDWU.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.18

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

1.77

-1.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.20

4.77

-4.97

XDWS.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWS.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the XDWU.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWS.DE and XDWU.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWS.DEXDWU.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

1.07

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.69

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.55

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.55

-0.10

Drawdowns

XDWS.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWS.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, smaller than the maximum XDWU.DE drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWS.DE and XDWU.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWS.DEXDWU.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.95%

-33.61%

+10.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-7.30%

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.90%

-12.68%

+0.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.47%

-23.26%

+10.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.95%

-33.61%

+10.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.60%

-7.22%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

-6.99%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

2.71%

+1.63%

Volatility

XDWS.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Utilities UCITS ETF 1C (XDWU.DE) at 4.08%. This indicates that XDWS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWS.DEXDWU.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

4.08%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.01%

10.09%

-0.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.06%

12.09%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.35%

14.12%

-2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.19%

15.16%

-2.97%

XDWS.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XDWS.DE and XDWU.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWS.DE vs. XDWU.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDWS.DE nor XDWU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWS.DE and XDWU.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDWS.DE and XDWU.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

XDWS.DE is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while XDWU.DE is Utilities Equities. XDWS.DE tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while XDWU.DE tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWS.DE and XDWU.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer