PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDWI.L vs. XSTC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDWI.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDWI.L is traded in USD, while XSTC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSTC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDWI.L achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's 23.02% return.


XDWI.L

1D
0.07%
1M
0.47%
YTD
11.24%
6M
12.95%
1Y
21.87%
3Y*
21.49%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
12.32%

XSTC.L

1D
-2.08%
1M
13.80%
YTD
23.02%
6M
22.95%
1Y
51.90%
3Y*
34.02%
5Y*
22.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDWI.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XDWI.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C
11.24%25.51%13.06%23.32%-12.72%16.09%11.85%27.17%-14.90%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
23.02%22.94%37.18%56.67%-30.82%32.26%45.87%48.94%-5.68%

Correlation

The correlation between XDWI.L and XSTC.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018

0.63

The correlation between XDWI.L and XSTC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XDWI.L vs. XSTC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDWI.L
XSTC.L

Industrials

95.1%
0.2%

Technology

3.5%
99.6%

Utilities

2.8%

-

Communication Services

0.6%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.3%

-

Financial Services

0.3%
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

0.1%

-

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Energy

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

XDWI.L
95.1%
XSTC.L
0.2%

Technology

XDWI.L
3.5%
XSTC.L
99.6%

Utilities

XDWI.L
2.8%
XSTC.L

-

Communication Services

XDWI.L
0.6%
XSTC.L
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XDWI.L
0.3%
XSTC.L

-

Financial Services

XDWI.L
0.3%
XSTC.L
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

XDWI.L
0.1%
XSTC.L

-

Basic Materials

XDWI.L
0.1%
XSTC.L

-

Real Estate

XDWI.L
0.0%
XSTC.L

-

Energy

XDWI.L

-

XSTC.L
0.1%

Healthcare

XDWI.L

-

XSTC.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDWI.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDWI.L
XDWI.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XDWI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

XSTC.L
XSTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDWI.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDWI.LXSTC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.42

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.95

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.36

8.80

-1.45

XDWI.L vs. XSTC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDWI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDWI.L and XSTC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDWI.LXSTC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.57

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.97

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

1.06

-0.35

Drawdowns

XDWI.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDWI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.92%, which is greater than XSTC.L's maximum drawdown of -35.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWI.L and XSTC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDWI.LXSTC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.92%

-35.20%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.28%

-17.54%

+6.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.25%

-27.66%

+12.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.26%

-35.20%

+7.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-3.01%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.38%

-7.34%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

5.88%

-2.91%

Volatility

XDWI.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) is 5.38%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that XDWI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDWI.LXSTC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.38%

7.06%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.31%

15.16%

-1.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.83%

20.09%

-4.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

23.50%

-6.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.77%

23.43%

-5.66%

XDWI.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDWI.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDWI.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison

XDWI.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
XDWI.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XSTC.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D
0.26%0.33%0.37%0.53%1.08%0.53%0.63%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDWI.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XSTC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XSTC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWI.L.

XDWI.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XSTC.L is Technology Equities. XDWI.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWI.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDWI.L and XSTC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer