XDWI.L vs. XLIS.L
XDWI.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C) and XLIS.L (Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both Industrials Equities funds - XDWI.L tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD while XLIS.L tracks the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWI.L returned 12.32%/yr vs 13.28%/yr for XLIS.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDWI.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLIS.L.
Performance
XDWI.L vs. XLIS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWI.L achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than XLIS.L's 12.54% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWI.L has underperformed XLIS.L with an annualized return of 12.32%, while XLIS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.28% annualized return.
XDWI.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 11.24%
- 6M
- 12.95%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
XLIS.L
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 12.54%
- 6M
- 13.72%
- 1Y
- 23.15%
- 3Y*
- 21.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
XDWI.L vs. XLIS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWI.L Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C | 11.24% | 25.51% | 13.06% | 23.32% | -12.72% | 16.09% | 11.85% | 27.17% | -14.83% | 25.36% |
XLIS.L Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 12.54% | 19.35% | 17.30% | 17.93% | -5.18% | 20.54% | 9.91% | 28.73% | -14.24% | 20.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWI.L and XLIS.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2016 | 0.92 |
The correlation between XDWI.L and XLIS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
XDWI.L vs. XLIS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDWI.L
XLIS.L
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
XDWI.L
XLIS.L
Technology
XDWI.L
XLIS.L
Utilities
XDWI.L
XLIS.L
-
Communication Services
XDWI.L
XLIS.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XDWI.L
XLIS.L
Financial Services
XDWI.L
XLIS.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XDWI.L
XLIS.L
-
Basic Materials
XDWI.L
XLIS.L
-
Real Estate
XDWI.L
XLIS.L
Energy
XDWI.L
-
XLIS.L
-
Healthcare
XDWI.L
-
XLIS.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWI.L vs. XLIS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWI.L
XLIS.L
XDWI.L vs. XLIS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) and Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWI.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 2.16 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 8.44 | -1.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWI.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.58 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.70 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.69 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.66 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
XDWI.L vs. XLIS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.92%, smaller than the maximum XLIS.L drawdown of -42.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWI.L and XLIS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWI.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.92% | -42.30% | +3.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.28% | -10.65% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.25% | -19.65% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.26% | -21.21% | -6.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.92% | -42.30% | +3.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -0.94% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -4.68% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 2.74% | +0.23% |
Volatility
XDWI.L vs. XLIS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Invesco Industrials S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLIS.L) at 4.85%. This indicates that XDWI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLIS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWI.L | XLIS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 4.85% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.31% | 11.77% | +1.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 14.58% | +1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.11% | 17.35% | -0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 19.12% | -1.35% |
XDWI.L vs. XLIS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWI.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLIS.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWI.L vs. XLIS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWI.L nor XLIS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, XDWI.L and XLIS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLIS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLIS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWI.L.
XDWI.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while XLIS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWI.L and 0.14% for XLIS.L.
Find the right allocation for XDWI.L and XLIS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer