XDWI.L vs. SXLB.L
XDWI.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C) and SXLB.L (SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, from Xtrackers and State Street respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWI.L returned 12.32%/yr vs 9.76%/yr for SXLB.L. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDWI.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SXLB.L.
Performance
XDWI.L vs. SXLB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWI.L achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than SXLB.L's 12.57% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWI.L has outperformed SXLB.L with an annualized return of 12.32%, while SXLB.L has yielded a comparatively lower 9.76% annualized return.
XDWI.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 11.24%
- 6M
- 12.95%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
SXLB.L
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 12.57%
- 6M
- 16.76%
- 1Y
- 18.30%
- 3Y*
- 11.15%
- 5Y*
- 5.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.76%
XDWI.L vs. SXLB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWI.L Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C | 11.24% | 25.51% | 13.06% | 23.32% | -12.72% | 16.09% | 11.85% | 27.17% | -14.83% | 25.36% |
SXLB.L SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF | 12.57% | 10.91% | -0.67% | 12.37% | -11.86% | 26.98% | 20.18% | 23.16% | -15.68% | 23.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWI.L and SXLB.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2016 | 0.80 |
The correlation between XDWI.L and SXLB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XDWI.L vs. SXLB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDWI.L
SXLB.L
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
XDWI.L
SXLB.L
-
Technology
XDWI.L
SXLB.L
-
Utilities
XDWI.L
SXLB.L
-
Communication Services
XDWI.L
SXLB.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XDWI.L
SXLB.L
Financial Services
XDWI.L
SXLB.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XDWI.L
SXLB.L
-
Basic Materials
XDWI.L
SXLB.L
Real Estate
XDWI.L
SXLB.L
-
Energy
XDWI.L
-
SXLB.L
-
Healthcare
XDWI.L
-
SXLB.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWI.L vs. SXLB.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWI.L
SXLB.L
XDWI.L vs. SXLB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) and SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWI.L | SXLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.19 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 1.60 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 4.74 | +2.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWI.L | SXLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.11 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.27 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.50 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.47 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
XDWI.L vs. SXLB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.92%, which is greater than SXLB.L's maximum drawdown of -36.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWI.L and SXLB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWI.L | SXLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.92% | -36.00% | -2.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.28% | -11.40% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.25% | -22.63% | +7.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.26% | -25.19% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.92% | -36.00% | -2.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -3.29% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -6.84% | +1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 3.85% | -0.88% |
Volatility
XDWI.L vs. SXLB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) is 5.38%, while SPDR S&P US Materials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLB.L) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that XDWI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SXLB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWI.L | SXLB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 6.04% | -0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.31% | 13.37% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 16.49% | -0.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.11% | 18.84% | -1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 19.58% | -1.81% |
XDWI.L vs. SXLB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWI.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SXLB.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWI.L vs. SXLB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWI.L nor SXLB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWI.L and SXLB.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXLB.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXLB.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWI.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Materials NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWI.L and 0.15% for SXLB.L.
Find the right allocation for XDWI.L and SXLB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer