XDWI.L vs. IISU.L
XDWI.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C) and IISU.L (iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Industrials Equities funds - XDWI.L tracks the MSCI World/Materials NR USD while IISU.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDWI.L returned 11.45%/yr vs 12.19%/yr for IISU.L. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDWI.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IISU.L.
Performance
XDWI.L vs. IISU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDWI.L is traded in USD, while IISU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IISU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWI.L achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than IISU.L's 12.36% return.
XDWI.L
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 11.24%
- 6M
- 12.95%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
IISU.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 12.36%
- 6M
- 13.85%
- 1Y
- 23.11%
- 3Y*
- 21.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.19%
- 10Y*
- —
XDWI.L vs. IISU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWI.L Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C | 11.24% | 25.51% | 13.06% | 23.32% | -12.72% | 16.09% | 11.85% | 27.17% | -14.83% | 18.73% |
IISU.L iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 12.36% | 19.63% | 17.30% | 17.33% | -5.28% | 21.09% | 9.50% | 29.46% | -14.33% | 16.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWI.L and IISU.L is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.87 |
The correlation between XDWI.L and IISU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
XDWI.L vs. IISU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDWI.L
IISU.L
Industrials
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
XDWI.L
IISU.L
Technology
XDWI.L
IISU.L
Utilities
XDWI.L
IISU.L
Communication Services
XDWI.L
IISU.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
XDWI.L
IISU.L
Financial Services
XDWI.L
IISU.L
-
Consumer Defensive
XDWI.L
IISU.L
-
Basic Materials
XDWI.L
IISU.L
Real Estate
XDWI.L
IISU.L
-
Energy
XDWI.L
-
IISU.L
-
Healthcare
XDWI.L
-
IISU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWI.L vs. IISU.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDWI.L
IISU.L
XDWI.L vs. IISU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) and iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWI.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.28 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 2.12 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 8.33 | -0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWI.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 1.64 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.71 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.65 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
XDWI.L vs. IISU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWI.L drawdown since its inception was -38.92%, smaller than the maximum IISU.L drawdown of -41.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWI.L and IISU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWI.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.92% | -41.81% | +2.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.28% | -10.84% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.25% | -19.93% | +4.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.26% | -21.88% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -1.21% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -5.12% | -0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 2.77% | +0.20% |
Volatility
XDWI.L vs. IISU.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Industrials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWI.L) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to iShares S&P 500 Industrials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IISU.L) at 4.63%. This indicates that XDWI.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IISU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWI.L | IISU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 4.63% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.31% | 11.28% | +2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.83% | 14.03% | +1.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.11% | 17.06% | +0.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.77% | 19.59% | -1.82% |
XDWI.L vs. IISU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWI.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than IISU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWI.L vs. IISU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWI.L nor IISU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWI.L and IISU.L have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IISU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IISU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWI.L.
XDWI.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while IISU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Industrials Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWI.L and 0.15% for IISU.L.
Find the right allocation for XDWI.L and IISU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer