XDWF.DE vs. SC0U.DE
XDWF.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C) and SC0U.DE (Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - XDWF.DE tracks the MSCI World Financials while SC0U.DE tracks the STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Banks. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDWF.DE returned 11.89%/yr vs 13.83%/yr for SC0U.DE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XDWF.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SC0U.DE.
Performance
XDWF.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDWF.DE achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly lower than SC0U.DE's 5.95% return. Over the past 10 years, XDWF.DE has underperformed SC0U.DE with an annualized return of 11.89%, while SC0U.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 13.83% annualized return.
XDWF.DE
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 4.65%
- 1Y
- 12.74%
- 3Y*
- 20.89%
- 5Y*
- 12.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
SC0U.DE
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 38.42%
- 3Y*
- 42.79%
- 5Y*
- 27.34%
- 10Y*
- 13.83%
XDWF.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDWF.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C | 1.15% | 15.35% | 34.08% | 12.42% | -4.87% | 39.49% | -11.91% | 29.11% | -13.92% | 8.33% |
SC0U.DE Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF | 5.95% | 79.97% | 32.49% | 25.93% | -0.07% | 37.72% | -22.62% | 15.49% | -26.78% | 10.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDWF.DE and SC0U.DE is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2016 | 0.77 |
The correlation between XDWF.DE and SC0U.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDWF.DE vs. SC0U.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDWF.DE
SC0U.DE
XDWF.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE) and Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (SC0U.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDWF.DE | SC0U.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.29 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 2.37 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.98 | 7.76 | -3.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDWF.DE | SC0U.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 1.74 | -0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 1.14 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.54 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.27 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
XDWF.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDWF.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.06%, smaller than the maximum SC0U.DE drawdown of -60.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDWF.DE and SC0U.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDWF.DE | SC0U.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.06% | -60.69% | +18.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.65% | -16.70% | +7.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.74% | -19.82% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.74% | -29.85% | +10.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.06% | -56.61% | +14.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -1.85% | +1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.06% | -20.40% | +14.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 5.10% | -1.96% |
Volatility
XDWF.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Financials UCITS ETF 1C (XDWF.DE) is 3.37%, while Invesco European Banks Sector UCITS ETF (SC0U.DE) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that XDWF.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SC0U.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDWF.DE | SC0U.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 6.03% | -2.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | 18.45% | -8.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.39% | 22.74% | -9.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 23.64% | -7.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.61% | 25.62% | -7.01% |
XDWF.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDWF.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SC0U.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDWF.DE vs. SC0U.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDWF.DE nor SC0U.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDWF.DE and SC0U.DE have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SC0U.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SC0U.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWF.DE.
XDWF.DE tracks MSCI World Financials, while SC0U.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Optimised Banks. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDWF.DE and 0.20% for SC0U.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDWF.DE and SC0U.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer