PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDW0.DE vs. XUEN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDW0.DE vs. XUEN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XUEN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XDW0.DE having a 32.75% return and XUEN.DE slightly lower at 32.35%.


XDW0.DE

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.29%
YTD
32.75%
6M
28.86%
1Y
45.88%
3Y*
15.71%
5Y*
20.33%
10Y*
9.20%

XUEN.DE

1D
-0.40%
1M
4.10%
YTD
32.35%
6M
28.01%
1Y
43.05%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
21.22%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDW0.DE vs. XUEN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDW0.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
32.75%2.24%7.48%0.18%53.95%52.18%-36.97%14.05%-12.13%10.90%
XUEN.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D
32.35%-3.28%10.56%-3.66%71.12%65.12%-40.59%12.55%-14.61%11.19%

Correlation

The correlation between XDW0.DE and XUEN.DE is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2017

0.98

The correlation between XDW0.DE and XUEN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDW0.DE vs. XUEN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDW0.DE
XDW0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XDW0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

XUEN.DE
XUEN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XUEN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUEN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUEN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XUEN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUEN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDW0.DE vs. XUEN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XUEN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDW0.DEXUEN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.31

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.44

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.92

7.67

+2.25

XDW0.DE vs. XUEN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDW0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the XUEN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDW0.DE and XUEN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDW0.DEXUEN.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.76

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.79

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.36

0.00

Drawdowns

XDW0.DE vs. XUEN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDW0.DE drawdown since its inception was -61.44%, roughly equal to the maximum XUEN.DE drawdown of -64.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.DE and XUEN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDW0.DEXUEN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.44%

-64.67%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.05%

-17.12%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.71%

-26.63%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.71%

-26.63%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.38%

-9.21%

+1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.84%

-16.97%

+3.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.53%

5.46%

-0.93%

Volatility

XDW0.DE vs. XUEN.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) is 6.96%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D (XUEN.DE) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that XDW0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUEN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDW0.DEXUEN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

7.71%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.42%

20.26%

-1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.48%

23.74%

-2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.04%

26.62%

-2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.02%

29.68%

-3.66%

XDW0.DE vs. XUEN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDW0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XUEN.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDW0.DE vs. XUEN.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDW0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XUEN.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
XDW0.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XUEN.DE
Xtrackers MSCI USA Energy UCITS ETF 1D
2.07%2.80%2.64%3.22%3.89%3.12%7.28%2.72%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, XDW0.DE and XUEN.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XUEN.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUEN.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDW0.DE.

XDW0.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while XUEN.DE tracks MSCI USA Energy 20/35 Custom. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDW0.DE and 0.12% for XUEN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDW0.DE and XUEN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer