PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDW0.DE vs. SMLD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDW0.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist (SMLD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDW0.DE achieves a 28.70% return, which is significantly higher than SMLD.DE's 23.53% return. Over the past 10 years, XDW0.DE has outperformed SMLD.DE with an annualized return of 8.15%, while SMLD.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.39% annualized return.


XDW0.DE

1D
-0.93%
1M
2.25%
6M
19.90%
YTD
28.70%
1Y
34.95%
3Y*
15.05%
5Y*
20.85%
10Y*
8.15%

SMLD.DE

1D
-0.22%
1M
5.15%
6M
16.19%
YTD
23.53%
1Y
19.37%
3Y*
17.07%
5Y*
19.28%
10Y*
6.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDW0.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDW0.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
28.70%2.24%7.48%0.19%53.95%52.21%-36.99%14.05%-12.13%-7.68%
SMLD.DE
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist
23.53%-8.84%28.79%15.50%39.45%46.81%-37.59%12.61%-11.81%-19.80%

Correlation

The correlation between XDW0.DE and SMLD.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2013

0.71

The correlation between XDW0.DE and SMLD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDW0.DE vs. SMLD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDW0.DE
XDW0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XDW0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

SMLD.DE
SMLD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDW0.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist (SMLD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDW0.DESMLD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.20

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

1.99

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.78

4.37

+1.41

XDW0.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDW0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the SMLD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDW0.DE and SMLD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDW0.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDW0.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.27%, smaller than the maximum SMLD.DE drawdown of -83.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.DE and SMLD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDW0.DESMLD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.27%

-83.65%

+17.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.55%

-9.68%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.70%

-22.99%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.70%

-22.99%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.44%

-76.32%

+14.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.20%

-1.24%

-8.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.94%

-33.93%

+10.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.03%

4.42%

+1.61%

Volatility

XDW0.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist (SMLD.DE) at 3.72%. This indicates that XDW0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMLD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDW0.DESMLD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

3.72%

+3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.48%

12.95%

+6.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.56%

16.64%

+5.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.24%

20.28%

+3.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.60%

29.07%

-2.47%

XDW0.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDW0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SMLD.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDW0.DE vs. SMLD.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDW0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMLD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.52%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMLD.DE
Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF Dist
7.52%8.45%7.99%8.81%8.09%8.24%11.54%9.90%9.70%8.60%7.76%9.80%
XDW0.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDW0.DE and SMLD.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDW0.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDW0.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SMLD.DE.

XDW0.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while SMLD.DE tracks Morningstar MLP Composite. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDW0.DE and 0.50% for SMLD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDW0.DE and SMLD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer