XDW0.DE vs. QCLN.DE
XDW0.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) and QCLN.DE (First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - XDW0.DE tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD while QCLN.DE tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDW0.DE returned 20.33%/yr vs 2.29%/yr for QCLN.DE. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDW0.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLN.DE.
Performance
XDW0.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDW0.DE achieves a 32.75% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN.DE's 49.11% return.
XDW0.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.29%
- YTD
- 32.75%
- 6M
- 28.86%
- 1Y
- 45.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.71%
- 5Y*
- 20.33%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
QCLN.DE
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 14.22%
- YTD
- 49.11%
- 6M
- 44.27%
- 1Y
- 112.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- —
XDW0.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 32.75% | 2.24% | 7.48% | 0.18% | 53.95% | 30.78% |
QCLN.DE First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 49.11% | 16.50% | -14.54% | -10.39% | -26.09% | -12.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDW0.DE and QCLN.DE is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2021 | 0.24 |
The correlation between XDW0.DE and QCLN.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDW0.DE vs. QCLN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDW0.DE
QCLN.DE
XDW0.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDW0.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.44 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 7.93 | -4.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.92 | 24.33 | -14.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDW0.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 3.20 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.06 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | -0.08 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
XDW0.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDW0.DE drawdown since its inception was -61.44%, smaller than the maximum QCLN.DE drawdown of -69.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.DE and QCLN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDW0.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.44% | -69.59% | +8.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.05% | -14.04% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.71% | -56.68% | +32.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.71% | -69.59% | +45.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.38% | -20.21% | +12.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.84% | -39.08% | +25.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | 4.59% | -0.06% |
Volatility
XDW0.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) is 6.96%, while First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.DE) has a volatility of 14.59%. This indicates that XDW0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDW0.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 14.59% | -7.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.42% | 24.80% | -6.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.48% | 34.84% | -13.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.04% | 36.29% | -12.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.02% | 36.76% | -10.74% |
XDW0.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDW0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLN.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDW0.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDW0.DE nor QCLN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDW0.DE and QCLN.DE have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDW0.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDW0.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLN.DE.
XDW0.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while QCLN.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDW0.DE and 0.60% for QCLN.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDW0.DE and QCLN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer