XDW0.DE vs. PPFB.DE
XDW0.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C) and PPFB.DE (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - XDW0.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while PPFB.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XDW0.DE returned 14.54%/yr vs 28.05%/yr for PPFB.DE. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDW0.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for PPFB.DE.
Performance
XDW0.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDW0.DE achieves a 31.10% return, which is significantly higher than PPFB.DE's 2.74% return.
XDW0.DE
- 1D
- -1.42%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 31.10%
- 6M
- 30.99%
- 1Y
- 36.74%
- 3Y*
- 14.54%
- 5Y*
- 19.61%
- 10Y*
- 9.16%
PPFB.DE
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- YTD
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- 1Y
- 29.94%
- 3Y*
- 28.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDW0.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDW0.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C | 31.10% | 2.24% | 7.48% | 0.19% | 53.95% | 16.29% |
PPFB.DE iShares Physical Gold ETC | 2.74% | 49.11% | 34.17% | 9.42% | 7.03% | 2.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDW0.DE and PPFB.DE is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | 0.10 |
The correlation between XDW0.DE and PPFB.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDW0.DE vs. PPFB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDW0.DE
PPFB.DE
XDW0.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XDW0.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.26 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.57 | 1.81 | +0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.23 | 4.60 | +3.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XDW0.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDW0.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.27%, which is greater than PPFB.DE's maximum drawdown of -16.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.DE and PPFB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDW0.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.27% | -16.60% | -49.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.05% | -16.60% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.70% | -16.60% | -7.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.44% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.52% | -15.00% | +6.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.00% | -4.42% | -18.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.71% | 6.55% | -1.84% |
Volatility
XDW0.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.78% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (PPFB.DE) at 5.11%. This indicates that XDW0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PPFB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDW0.DE | PPFB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.78% | 5.11% | +1.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.98% | 20.18% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.83% | 23.12% | -1.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.12% | 16.13% | +7.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.55% | 16.13% | +10.42% |
XDW0.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDW0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than PPFB.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDW0.DE vs. PPFB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDW0.DE nor PPFB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDW0.DE and PPFB.DE have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PPFB.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PPFB.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDW0.DE.
XDW0.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while PPFB.DE is Precious Metals. XDW0.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while PPFB.DE tracks Gold. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDW0.DE and 0.12% for PPFB.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDW0.DE and PPFB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer