PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDW0.DE vs. NOVO-B.CO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDW0.DE vs. NOVO-B.CO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NOVO-B.CO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDW0.DE is traded in EUR, while NOVO-B.CO is traded in DKK. To make them comparable, the NOVO-B.CO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDW0.DE achieves a 31.10% return, which is significantly higher than NOVO-B.CO's -8.77% return. Over the past 10 years, XDW0.DE has underperformed NOVO-B.CO with an annualized return of 9.16%, while NOVO-B.CO has yielded a comparatively higher 17.26% annualized return.


XDW0.DE

1D
-1.42%
1M
0.33%
YTD
31.10%
6M
30.99%
1Y
36.74%
3Y*
14.54%
5Y*
19.61%
10Y*
9.16%

NOVO-B.CO

1D
1.61%
1M
-4.08%
YTD
-8.77%
6M
-7.60%
1Y
-41.92%
3Y*
4.37%
5Y*
20.51%
10Y*
17.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDW0.DE vs. NOVO-B.CO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDW0.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
31.10%2.24%7.48%0.19%53.95%52.21%-36.99%14.05%-12.13%-7.68%
NOVO-B.CO
Novo Nordisk A/S
-8.77%-46.44%-9.91%205.51%31.09%79.61%15.78%35.77%-6.27%39.30%

Correlation

The correlation between XDW0.DE and NOVO-B.CO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2010

0.15

The correlation between XDW0.DE and NOVO-B.CO shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDW0.DE vs. NOVO-B.CO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDW0.DE
XDW0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XDW0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

NOVO-B.CO
NOVO-B.CO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NOVO-B.CO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOVO-B.CO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOVO-B.CO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
NOVO-B.CO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOVO-B.CO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDW0.DE vs. NOVO-B.CO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NOVO-B.CO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDW0.DENOVO-B.CODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

0.87

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

-0.78

+3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.23

-1.15

+9.39

XDW0.DE vs. NOVO-B.CO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDW0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the NOVO-B.CO Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDW0.DE and NOVO-B.CO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDW0.DE vs. NOVO-B.CO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDW0.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.27%, smaller than the maximum NOVO-B.CO drawdown of -76.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.DE and NOVO-B.CO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDW0.DENOVO-B.CODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.27%

-76.81%

+10.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.05%

-54.72%

+39.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.70%

-76.81%

+53.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.70%

-76.81%

+53.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.44%

-76.81%

+15.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.52%

-70.26%

+61.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.00%

-11.90%

-11.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.71%

37.20%

-32.49%

Volatility

XDW0.DE vs. NOVO-B.CO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) is 6.78%, while Novo Nordisk A/S (NOVO-B.CO) has a volatility of 11.47%. This indicates that XDW0.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOVO-B.CO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDW0.DENOVO-B.CODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.78%

11.47%

-4.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.98%

39.57%

-20.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.83%

54.44%

-32.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.12%

58.61%

-34.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.55%

45.19%

-18.64%

Dividends

XDW0.DE vs. NOVO-B.CO - Dividend Comparison

XDW0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NOVO-B.CO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NOVO-B.CO
Novo Nordisk A/S
4.07%3.58%1.59%1.01%2.38%2.54%4.03%4.22%5.27%4.54%7.38%2.50%
XDW0.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDW0.DE and NOVO-B.CO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDW0.DE and NOVO-B.CO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer