PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDW0.DE vs. JMLP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDW0.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDW0.DE achieves a 28.70% return, which is significantly lower than JMLP.DE's 34.01% return.


XDW0.DE

1D
-0.93%
1M
2.25%
6M
19.90%
YTD
28.70%
1Y
34.95%
3Y*
15.05%
5Y*
20.85%
10Y*
8.15%

JMLP.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
5.39%
6M
31.51%
YTD
34.01%
1Y
36.54%
3Y*
24.87%
5Y*
20.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDW0.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XDW0.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
28.70%2.24%7.48%0.19%53.95%52.21%3.02%
JMLP.DE
HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF
34.01%-5.93%40.86%9.97%28.08%44.11%1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between XDW0.DE and JMLP.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2020

0.77

The correlation between XDW0.DE and JMLP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDW0.DE vs. JMLP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDW0.DE
XDW0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XDW0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDW0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

JMLP.DE
JMLP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
JMLP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMLP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMLP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
JMLP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMLP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDW0.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDW0.DEJMLP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

3.33

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.78

9.43

-3.65

XDW0.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDW0.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the JMLP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDW0.DE and JMLP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDW0.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDW0.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.27%, which is greater than JMLP.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDW0.DE and JMLP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDW0.DEJMLP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.27%

-22.29%

-43.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.55%

-11.02%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.70%

-22.29%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.70%

-22.29%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.20%

-0.22%

-9.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.94%

-6.40%

-16.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.03%

3.89%

+2.14%

Volatility

XDW0.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C (XDW0.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) at 5.32%. This indicates that XDW0.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMLP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDW0.DEJMLP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

5.32%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.48%

16.12%

+3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.56%

19.46%

+3.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.24%

20.40%

+3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.60%

21.42%

+5.18%

XDW0.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDW0.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JMLP.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDW0.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Dividend Comparison

XDW0.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JMLP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
JMLP.DE
HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF
2.74%3.38%3.34%6.50%6.31%6.46%4.11%
XDW0.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Energy UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDW0.DE and JMLP.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDW0.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDW0.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for JMLP.DE.

XDW0.DE tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD, while JMLP.DE tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XDW0.DE and 0.40% for JMLP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDW0.DE and JMLP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer