PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDV.TO vs. XFN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDV.TO vs. XFN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF (XDV.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDV.TO achieves a 16.45% return, which is significantly higher than XFN.TO's 12.51% return. Over the past 10 years, XDV.TO has underperformed XFN.TO with an annualized return of 11.99%, while XFN.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 14.38% annualized return.


XDV.TO

1D
-0.09%
1M
4.74%
YTD
16.45%
6M
20.26%
1Y
39.82%
3Y*
23.34%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
11.99%

XFN.TO

1D
-0.55%
1M
5.10%
YTD
12.51%
6M
17.66%
1Y
41.54%
3Y*
29.67%
5Y*
16.93%
10Y*
14.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDV.TO vs. XFN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDV.TO
iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF
16.45%29.37%21.28%8.00%-8.57%31.30%-0.38%21.30%-12.48%11.06%
XFN.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF
12.51%34.40%29.32%13.09%-9.92%35.57%0.99%20.66%-9.76%12.54%

Correlation

The correlation between XDV.TO and XFN.TO is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2005

0.88

The correlation between XDV.TO and XFN.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDV.TO vs. XFN.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDV.TO
XFN.TO

Financial Services

51.5%
100.0%

Energy

11.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%

-

Utilities

11.0%

-

Communication Services

7.5%

-

Industrials

3.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Financial Services

XDV.TO
51.5%
XFN.TO
100.0%

Energy

XDV.TO
11.8%
XFN.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

XDV.TO
11.5%
XFN.TO

-

Utilities

XDV.TO
11.0%
XFN.TO

-

Communication Services

XDV.TO
7.5%
XFN.TO

-

Industrials

XDV.TO
3.3%
XFN.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

XDV.TO
1.7%
XFN.TO

-

Basic Materials

XDV.TO
1.6%
XFN.TO

-

Healthcare

XDV.TO

-

XFN.TO

-

Real Estate

XDV.TO

-

XFN.TO

-

Technology

XDV.TO

-

XFN.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDV.TO vs. XFN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDV.TO
XDV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XDV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XDV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

XFN.TO
XFN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XFN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDV.TO vs. XFN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF (XDV.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDV.TOXFN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.02

1.61

+0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.35

5.35

+3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.42

21.60

+19.81

XDV.TO vs. XFN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.11, which is higher than the XFN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDV.TO and XFN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDV.TOXFN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.11

3.46

+1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.26

1.26

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.87

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.64

-0.05

Drawdowns

XDV.TO vs. XFN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDV.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.56%, smaller than the maximum XFN.TO drawdown of -56.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDV.TO and XFN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDV.TOXFN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.56%

-56.55%

+7.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.79%

-7.80%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-12.37%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.52%

-21.90%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.08%

-39.93%

+0.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-1.39%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-6.60%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

1.93%

-0.97%

Volatility

XDV.TO vs. XFN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF (XDV.TO) is 2.79%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN.TO) has a volatility of 4.19%. This indicates that XDV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XFN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDV.TOXFN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

4.19%

-1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.53%

10.10%

-3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.83%

12.07%

-4.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.71%

13.47%

-2.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.63%

16.53%

-1.90%

XDV.TO vs. XFN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDV.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than XFN.TO's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDV.TO vs. XFN.TO - Dividend Comparison

XDV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, more than XFN.TO's 2.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XDV.TO
iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF
3.36%3.46%4.34%4.62%4.49%3.82%4.78%4.21%4.92%3.65%3.91%4.75%
XFN.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF
2.17%2.39%3.16%3.60%3.48%2.67%3.35%3.00%3.43%2.73%2.83%3.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDV.TO and XFN.TO have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDV.TO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDV.TO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for XFN.TO.

XDV.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while XFN.TO is Financials Equities. XDV.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while XFN.TO tracks Morningstar Gbl Fin Svc GR CAD. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for XDV.TO and 0.61% for XFN.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDV.TO and XFN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer