PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XDV.TO vs. CFOU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XDV.TO vs. CFOU.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XDV.TO (iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF) and CFOU.TO (BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDV.TO is a Canada Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while CFOU.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDV.TO returned 11.99%/yr vs 22.91%/yr for CFOU.TO. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDV.TO charges 0.55%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for CFOU.TO.

Performance

XDV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF (XDV.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDV.TO achieves a 16.45% return, which is significantly lower than CFOU.TO's 23.22% return. Over the past 10 years, XDV.TO has underperformed CFOU.TO with an annualized return of 11.99%, while CFOU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 22.91% annualized return.

XDV.TO

1D
-0.09%
1M
4.74%
YTD
16.45%
6M
20.26%
1Y
39.82%
3Y*
23.34%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
11.99%

CFOU.TO

1D
-1.41%
1M
9.71%
YTD
23.22%
6M
34.47%
1Y
88.95%
3Y*
57.23%
5Y*
28.45%
10Y*
22.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDV.TO
iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF		16.45%29.37%21.28%8.00%-8.57%31.30%-0.38%21.30%-12.48%11.06%
CFOU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF		23.22%69.17%56.15%18.37%-23.64%79.61%-14.70%40.45%-21.67%22.44%

Correlation

The correlation between XDV.TO and CFOU.TO is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2007

0.87

The correlation between XDV.TO and CFOU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XDV.TO
CFOU.TO

Financial Services

51.5%
100.0%

Energy

11.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.5%

-

Utilities

11.0%

-

Communication Services

7.5%

-

Industrials

3.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

1.6%

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Financial Services

XDV.TO
51.5%
CFOU.TO
100.0%

Energy

XDV.TO
11.8%
CFOU.TO

-

Consumer Cyclical

XDV.TO
11.5%
CFOU.TO

-

Utilities

XDV.TO
11.0%
CFOU.TO

-

Communication Services

XDV.TO
7.5%
CFOU.TO

-

Industrials

XDV.TO
3.3%
CFOU.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

XDV.TO
1.7%
CFOU.TO

-

Basic Materials

XDV.TO
1.6%
CFOU.TO

-

Healthcare

XDV.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Real Estate

XDV.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Technology

XDV.TO

-

CFOU.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF

BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF

Often compared with XDV.TO:
XDV.TO vs. XDIV.TOXDV.TO vs. VDY.TOXDV.TO vs. XEI.TOXDV.TO vs. CDZ.TOXDV.TO vs. ZDV.TOXDV.TO vs. XIU.TOXDV.TO vs. ZSP.TO
Often compared with CFOU.TO:
CFOU.TO vs. METE.TOCFOU.TO vs. TCND.TOCFOU.TO vs. CACE.TOCFOU.TO vs. HBNK.TOCFOU.TO vs. RBNK.TOCFOU.TO vs. XCSR.TOCFOU.TO vs. DMEC.TO

Return for Risk

XDV.TO vs. CFOU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XDV.TO
XDV.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
XDV.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDV.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDV.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XDV.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDV.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO
CFOU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFOU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF (XDV.TO) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XDV.TOCFOU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
5.11
3.62

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
7.58
4.39

+3.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.02

1.57

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.35

5.56

+2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.42

22.74

+18.68

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XDV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDV.TO Sharpe Ratio is 5.11, which is higher than the CFOU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDV.TO and CFOU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XDV.TOCFOU.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.11

3.62

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.26

1.04

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.68

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.33

+0.26

Drawdowns

XDV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDV.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.56%, smaller than the maximum CFOU.TO drawdown of -86.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDV.TO and CFOU.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XDV.TOCFOU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.56%

-86.23%

+37.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.79%

-16.08%

+11.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.99%

-24.95%

+11.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.52%

-45.23%

+24.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.08%

-67.29%

+28.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-3.23%

+3.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-22.46%

+15.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.96%

3.93%

-2.97%

Volatility

XDV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF (XDV.TO) is 2.79%, while BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF (CFOU.TO) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that XDV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CFOU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XDV.TOCFOU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

8.18%

-5.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.53%

20.93%

-14.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.83%

24.70%

-16.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.71%

27.56%

-16.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.63%

33.85%

-19.22%

XDV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDV.TO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CFOU.TO's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

XDV.TO vs. CFOU.TO - Dividend Comparison

XDV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, while CFOU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFOU.TO
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Financials 2x Daily Bull ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDV.TO
iShares Canadian Select Dividend Index ETF		3.36%3.46%4.34%4.62%4.49%3.82%4.78%4.21%4.92%3.65%3.91%4.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

XDV.TO and CFOU.TO have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDV.TO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDV.TO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for CFOU.TO.

XDV.TO is categorized as Canada Equities, while CFOU.TO is Leveraged Equities. XDV.TO tracks Morningstar Canada GR CAD, while CFOU.TO tracks S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for XDV.TO and 1.52% for CFOU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDV.TO and CFOU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer