XDUS.L vs. XXTW.L
XDUS.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C) and XXTW.L (Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XDUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while XXTW.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XDUS.L returned 28.78% vs 53.00% for XXTW.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDUS.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XXTW.L.
Performance
XDUS.L vs. XXTW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XDUS.L is traded in GBp, while XXTW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XXTW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDUS.L achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly lower than XXTW.L's 24.48% return.
XDUS.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.63%
- YTD
- 10.50%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- 28.78%
- 3Y*
- 19.16%
- 5Y*
- 14.56%
- 10Y*
- 16.05%
XXTW.L
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 15.15%
- YTD
- 24.48%
- 6M
- 22.94%
- 1Y
- 53.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDUS.L vs. XXTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XDUS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C | 10.50% | 9.21% | 27.38% | 7.47% |
XXTW.L Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF | 24.48% | 13.82% | 36.21% | 14.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDUS.L and XXTW.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2023 | 0.86 |
The correlation between XDUS.L and XXTW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDUS.L vs. XXTW.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDUS.L
XXTW.L
XDUS.L vs. XXTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDUS.L | XXTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.45 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 3.14 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.55 | 8.22 | +5.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDUS.L | XXTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 2.73 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 1.52 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
XDUS.L vs. XXTW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDUS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.82%, smaller than the maximum XXTW.L drawdown of -28.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDUS.L and XXTW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDUS.L | XXTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.82% | -28.44% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.50% | -16.79% | +9.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -2.31% | +2.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.60% | -5.02% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 6.43% | -4.31% |
Volatility
XDUS.L vs. XXTW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) is 2.60%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Information Technology UCITS ETF (XXTW.L) has a volatility of 6.76%. This indicates that XDUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XXTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDUS.L | XXTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 6.76% | -4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.27% | 14.37% | -7.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.70% | 19.30% | -8.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 21.48% | -6.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 21.48% | -5.23% |
XDUS.L vs. XXTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDUS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XXTW.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDUS.L vs. XXTW.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDUS.L nor XXTW.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDUS.L and XXTW.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDUS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDUS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XXTW.L.
XDUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XXTW.L is Technology Equities. XDUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while XXTW.L tracks MSCI World Information Technology 20/35 Custom index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XDUS.L and 0.25% for XXTW.L.
Find the right allocation for XDUS.L and XXTW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer