XDUS.L vs. XSTC.L
XDUS.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C) and XSTC.L (Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - XDUS.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while XSTC.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XDUS.L returned 14.56%/yr vs 24.21%/yr for XSTC.L. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XDUS.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for XSTC.L.
Performance
XDUS.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDUS.L achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's 23.32% return.
XDUS.L
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 5.63%
- YTD
- 10.50%
- 6M
- 10.29%
- 1Y
- 28.78%
- 3Y*
- 19.16%
- 5Y*
- 14.56%
- 10Y*
- 16.05%
XSTC.L
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 14.77%
- YTD
- 23.32%
- 6M
- 22.05%
- 1Y
- 53.36%
- 3Y*
- 30.65%
- 5Y*
- 24.21%
- 10Y*
- —
XDUS.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDUS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C | 10.50% | 9.21% | 27.38% | 20.65% | -10.42% | 28.96% | 16.52% | 26.57% | 2.92% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 23.32% | 14.31% | 39.50% | 48.82% | -22.54% | 33.47% | 41.54% | 43.20% | 3.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDUS.L and XSTC.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2018 | 0.86 |
The correlation between XDUS.L and XSTC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
XDUS.L vs. XSTC.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XDUS.L
XSTC.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
XDUS.L
XSTC.L
Financial Services
XDUS.L
XSTC.L
Communication Services
XDUS.L
XSTC.L
Consumer Cyclical
XDUS.L
XSTC.L
-
Healthcare
XDUS.L
XSTC.L
-
Industrials
XDUS.L
XSTC.L
Consumer Defensive
XDUS.L
XSTC.L
-
Energy
XDUS.L
XSTC.L
Utilities
XDUS.L
XSTC.L
-
Real Estate
XDUS.L
XSTC.L
-
Basic Materials
XDUS.L
XSTC.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDUS.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank
XDUS.L
XSTC.L
XDUS.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDUS.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.44 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 3.04 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.55 | 7.79 | +5.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDUS.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68 | 2.70 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 1.09 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 1.14 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
XDUS.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDUS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.82%, smaller than the maximum XSTC.L drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDUS.L and XSTC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDUS.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.82% | -29.30% | +3.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.50% | -17.49% | +9.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.51% | -29.30% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.51% | -29.30% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -2.71% | +2.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.60% | -6.30% | +2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 6.83% | -4.71% |
Volatility
XDUS.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) is 2.60%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that XDUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDUS.L | XSTC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 7.05% | -4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.27% | 14.45% | -7.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.70% | 19.63% | -8.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 22.22% | -7.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 22.43% | -6.18% |
XDUS.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDUS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XDUS.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison
XDUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDUS.L Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.37% | 0.53% | 1.08% | 0.53% | 0.63% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XDUS.L and XSTC.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDUS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDUS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XSTC.L.
XDUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XSTC.L is Technology Equities. XDUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while XSTC.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XDUS.L and 0.12% for XSTC.L.
Find the right allocation for XDUS.L and XSTC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer