PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDUS.L vs. UKDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDUS.L vs. UKDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) and SPDR S&P UK Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (UKDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDUS.L is traded in GBp, while UKDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the UKDV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDUS.L achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly higher than UKDV.L's 6.02% return. Over the past 10 years, XDUS.L has outperformed UKDV.L with an annualized return of 16.05%, while UKDV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.20% annualized return.


XDUS.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.63%
YTD
10.50%
6M
10.29%
1Y
28.78%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
14.56%
10Y*
16.05%

UKDV.L

1D
2.06%
1M
3.28%
YTD
6.02%
6M
8.54%
1Y
16.24%
3Y*
12.50%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
5.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDUS.L vs. UKDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDUS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C
10.50%9.21%27.38%20.65%-10.42%28.96%16.52%26.57%-0.19%10.82%
UKDV.L
SPDR S&P UK Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)
6.02%17.63%11.01%6.36%-7.44%14.90%-16.96%35.13%-15.00%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between XDUS.L and UKDV.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2014

0.45

XDUS.L vs. UKDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDUS.L
UKDV.L

Technology

35.4%
1.1%

Financial Services

11.6%
33.0%

Communication Services

11.3%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
5.8%

Healthcare

8.6%
7.0%

Industrials

8.6%
19.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
11.9%

Energy

3.6%

-

Utilities

2.3%
4.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
11.2%

Basic Materials

1.8%
3.1%

Technology

XDUS.L
35.4%
UKDV.L
1.1%

Financial Services

XDUS.L
11.6%
UKDV.L
33.0%

Communication Services

XDUS.L
11.3%
UKDV.L
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XDUS.L
10.1%
UKDV.L
5.8%

Healthcare

XDUS.L
8.6%
UKDV.L
7.0%

Industrials

XDUS.L
8.6%
UKDV.L
19.8%

Consumer Defensive

XDUS.L
4.8%
UKDV.L
11.9%

Energy

XDUS.L
3.6%
UKDV.L

-

Utilities

XDUS.L
2.3%
UKDV.L
4.7%

Real Estate

XDUS.L
1.9%
UKDV.L
11.2%

Basic Materials

XDUS.L
1.8%
UKDV.L
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDUS.L vs. UKDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDUS.L
XDUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XDUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

UKDV.L
UKDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
UKDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UKDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
UKDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
UKDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
UKDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDUS.L vs. UKDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) and SPDR S&P UK Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (UKDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDUS.LUKDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.22

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

1.57

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.55

5.36

+8.19

XDUS.L vs. UKDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the UKDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDUS.L and UKDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDUS.LUKDV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

1.20

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

0.54

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

0.33

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.42

+0.66

Drawdowns

XDUS.L vs. UKDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDUS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.82%, smaller than the maximum UKDV.L drawdown of -38.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDUS.L and UKDV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDUS.LUKDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.82%

-38.04%

+12.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.50%

-10.32%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.51%

-12.84%

-8.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.51%

-18.19%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.82%

-38.04%

+12.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-1.65%

+1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-7.05%

+3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

3.02%

-0.90%

Volatility

XDUS.L vs. UKDV.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) is 2.60%, while SPDR S&P UK Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (UKDV.L) has a volatility of 4.77%. This indicates that XDUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UKDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDUS.LUKDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

4.77%

-2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

11.53%

-4.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.70%

13.50%

-2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

14.16%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

15.84%

+0.41%

XDUS.L vs. UKDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDUS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than UKDV.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDUS.L vs. UKDV.L - Dividend Comparison

XDUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UKDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UKDV.L
SPDR S&P UK Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.96%4.23%4.03%4.21%5.24%4.25%3.58%5.99%5.23%4.32%5.16%5.49%
XDUS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDUS.L and UKDV.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDUS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDUS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for UKDV.L.

XDUS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UKDV.L is Europe Equities. XDUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while UKDV.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XDUS.L and 0.30% for UKDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDUS.L and UKDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer