PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDUS.L vs. UDVD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDUS.L is traded in GBp, while UDVD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UDVD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDUS.L achieves a 8.97% return, which is significantly lower than UDVD.L's 12.53% return. Over the past 10 years, XDUS.L has outperformed UDVD.L with an annualized return of 14.48%, while UDVD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.59% annualized return.


XDUS.L

1D
-0.98%
1M
-0.78%
6M
7.41%
YTD
8.97%
1Y
19.29%
3Y*
18.30%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
14.48%

UDVD.L

1D
0.52%
1M
1.57%
6M
7.17%
YTD
12.53%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
9.03%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDUS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C
8.97%9.21%27.38%20.65%-10.42%28.96%16.52%26.57%-0.19%10.82%
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
12.53%0.84%9.52%-3.05%11.52%26.23%-2.19%17.98%1.76%5.73%

Correlation

The correlation between XDUS.L and UDVD.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between XDUS.L and UDVD.L has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XDUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDUS.L
UDVD.L

Technology

38.9%
12.1%

Financial Services

10.9%
12.0%

Communication Services

10.7%
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
5.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
7.5%

Industrials

8.1%
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.4%
16.3%

Energy

3.2%
3.1%

Utilities

2.0%
14.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
4.5%

Basic Materials

1.7%
5.4%

Technology

XDUS.L
38.9%
UDVD.L
12.1%

Financial Services

XDUS.L
10.9%
UDVD.L
12.0%

Communication Services

XDUS.L
10.7%
UDVD.L
2.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XDUS.L
9.9%
UDVD.L
5.1%

Healthcare

XDUS.L
8.4%
UDVD.L
7.5%

Industrials

XDUS.L
8.1%
UDVD.L
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

XDUS.L
4.4%
UDVD.L
16.3%

Energy

XDUS.L
3.2%
UDVD.L
3.1%

Utilities

XDUS.L
2.0%
UDVD.L
14.2%

Real Estate

XDUS.L
1.8%
UDVD.L
4.5%

Basic Materials

XDUS.L
1.7%
UDVD.L
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDUS.L vs. UDVD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDUS.L
XDUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XDUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

UDVD.L
UDVD.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDVD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XDUS.LUDVD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.24

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

2.30

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.87

5.98

+2.88

XDUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the UDVD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDUS.L and UDVD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XDUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDUS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.82%, smaller than the maximum UDVD.L drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDUS.L and UDVD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDUS.LUDVD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.82%

-28.19%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.50%

-6.47%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.51%

-16.57%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.51%

-16.57%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.82%

-28.19%

+2.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-0.77%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.48%

-4.18%

+0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.50%

-0.33%

Volatility

XDUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) is 3.15%, while SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (UDVD.L) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that XDUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UDVD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDUS.LUDVD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

4.11%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

8.73%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.26%

10.92%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.69%

13.80%

+0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.62%

15.86%

-0.24%

XDUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDUS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than UDVD.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDUS.L vs. UDVD.L - Dividend Comparison

XDUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UDVD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UDVD.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.00%2.17%2.03%2.24%2.13%2.15%2.36%2.01%2.27%1.78%1.83%2.06%
XDUS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDUS.L and UDVD.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDUS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDUS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for UDVD.L.

XDUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while UDVD.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XDUS.L and 0.35% for UDVD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDUS.L and UDVD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer