PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDUS.L vs. ISDU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDUS.L vs. ISDU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) and iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XDUS.L is traded in GBp, while ISDU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ISDU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDUS.L achieves a 10.50% return, which is significantly lower than ISDU.L's 23.26% return. Over the past 10 years, XDUS.L has outperformed ISDU.L with an annualized return of 16.05%, while ISDU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 13.26% annualized return.


XDUS.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.63%
YTD
10.50%
6M
10.29%
1Y
28.78%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
14.56%
10Y*
16.05%

ISDU.L

1D
-0.70%
1M
11.89%
YTD
23.26%
6M
22.97%
1Y
42.68%
3Y*
17.07%
5Y*
15.57%
10Y*
13.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDUS.L vs. ISDU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDUS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C
10.50%9.21%27.38%20.65%-10.42%28.96%16.52%26.57%-0.19%10.82%
ISDU.L
iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF
23.26%8.03%11.27%19.55%-1.43%30.82%3.71%16.03%-0.47%4.17%

Correlation

The correlation between XDUS.L and ISDU.L is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2014

0.75

The correlation between XDUS.L and ISDU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

XDUS.L vs. ISDU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XDUS.L
ISDU.L

Technology

35.4%
49.7%

Financial Services

11.6%

-

Communication Services

11.3%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
8.8%

Healthcare

8.6%
10.8%

Industrials

8.6%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.2%

Energy

3.6%
12.3%

Utilities

2.3%
0.7%

Real Estate

1.9%
0.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
5.5%

Technology

XDUS.L
35.4%
ISDU.L
49.7%

Financial Services

XDUS.L
11.6%
ISDU.L

-

Communication Services

XDUS.L
11.3%
ISDU.L
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XDUS.L
10.1%
ISDU.L
8.8%

Healthcare

XDUS.L
8.6%
ISDU.L
10.8%

Industrials

XDUS.L
8.6%
ISDU.L
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

XDUS.L
4.8%
ISDU.L
4.2%

Energy

XDUS.L
3.6%
ISDU.L
12.3%

Utilities

XDUS.L
2.3%
ISDU.L
0.7%

Real Estate

XDUS.L
1.9%
ISDU.L
0.1%

Basic Materials

XDUS.L
1.8%
ISDU.L
5.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDUS.L vs. ISDU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDUS.L
XDUS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
XDUS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDUS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

ISDU.L
ISDU.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ISDU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISDU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISDU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ISDU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISDU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDUS.L vs. ISDU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) and iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDUS.LISDU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.58

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

7.26

-3.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.55

22.62

-9.07

XDUS.L vs. ISDU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDUS.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is comparable to the ISDU.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDUS.L and ISDU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDUS.LISDU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

3.26

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

1.00

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

0.81

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.80

+0.28

Drawdowns

XDUS.L vs. ISDU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDUS.L drawdown since its inception was -25.82%, roughly equal to the maximum ISDU.L drawdown of -24.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDUS.L and ISDU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDUS.LISDU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.82%

-24.76%

-1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.50%

-5.85%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.51%

-24.06%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.51%

-24.06%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.82%

-24.76%

-1.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-0.70%

+0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-3.88%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

1.88%

+0.24%

Volatility

XDUS.L vs. ISDU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C (XDUS.L) is 2.60%, while iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that XDUS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISDU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDUS.LISDU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

5.05%

-2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

9.91%

-2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.70%

13.03%

-2.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.64%

15.64%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

16.42%

-0.17%

XDUS.L vs. ISDU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDUS.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ISDU.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

XDUS.L vs. ISDU.L - Dividend Comparison

XDUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISDU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISDU.L
iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF
0.62%0.74%0.90%1.10%1.52%1.01%1.39%1.37%1.49%1.38%1.34%1.43%
XDUS.L
Xtrackers MSCI USA UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XDUS.L and ISDU.L have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDUS.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDUS.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ISDU.L.

XDUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while ISDU.L tracks MSCI USA Islamic Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for XDUS.L and 0.30% for ISDU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDUS.L and ISDU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer