XDUK.DE vs. IBCJ.DE
XDUK.DE (Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and IBCJ.DE (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - XDUK.DE tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP while IBCJ.DE tracks the MSCI Poland. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XDUK.DE returned 7.99%/yr vs 9.17%/yr for IBCJ.DE. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XDUK.DE charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IBCJ.DE.
Performance
XDUK.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XDUK.DE achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly lower than IBCJ.DE's 16.30% return. Over the past 10 years, XDUK.DE has underperformed IBCJ.DE with an annualized return of 7.99%, while IBCJ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.17% annualized return.
XDUK.DE
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 6.84%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 17.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.55%
- 10Y*
- 7.99%
IBCJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.95%
- YTD
- 16.30%
- 6M
- 26.50%
- 1Y
- 40.90%
- 3Y*
- 29.89%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
XDUK.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XDUK.DE Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 6.84% | 20.16% | 14.10% | 9.87% | -1.71% | 25.10% | -15.31% | 25.14% | -10.59% | 7.62% |
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 16.30% | 53.66% | -0.42% | 43.86% | -21.74% | 14.34% | -18.69% | -3.73% | -9.07% | 35.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between XDUK.DE and IBCJ.DE is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2012 | 0.50 |
The correlation between XDUK.DE and IBCJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XDUK.DE vs. IBCJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XDUK.DE
IBCJ.DE
XDUK.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XDUK.DE) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XDUK.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.28 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 3.90 | -1.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.89 | 9.60 | -1.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XDUK.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 1.65 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.55 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.36 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.15 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
XDUK.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XDUK.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.87%, smaller than the maximum IBCJ.DE drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDUK.DE and IBCJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XDUK.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.87% | -56.11% | +16.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.81% | -9.96% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.05% | -18.47% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.05% | -47.31% | +30.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.87% | -56.11% | +16.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.86% | -1.16% | -1.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -19.38% | +13.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 4.05% | -1.83% |
Volatility
XDUK.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XDUK.DE) is 4.93%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that XDUK.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XDUK.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 7.13% | -2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.33% | 17.61% | -7.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 23.48% | -11.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.12% | 26.72% | -12.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.78% | 25.15% | -8.37% |
XDUK.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XDUK.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCJ.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
XDUK.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XDUK.DE nor IBCJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XDUK.DE and IBCJ.DE have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDUK.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDUK.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
XDUK.DE tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while IBCJ.DE tracks MSCI Poland. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDUK.DE and 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for XDUK.DE and IBCJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer