PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XDUK.DE vs. CEMS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XDUK.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XDUK.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XDUK.DE achieves a 6.84% return, which is significantly lower than CEMS.DE's 13.72% return. Over the past 10 years, XDUK.DE has underperformed CEMS.DE with an annualized return of 7.99%, while CEMS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.71% annualized return.


XDUK.DE

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
6.84%
6M
9.86%
1Y
17.54%
3Y*
14.66%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
7.99%

CEMS.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
2.64%
YTD
13.72%
6M
16.98%
1Y
32.08%
3Y*
21.63%
5Y*
14.47%
10Y*
10.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XDUK.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XDUK.DE
Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 1C
6.84%20.16%14.10%9.87%-1.71%25.10%-15.31%25.14%-10.59%7.62%
CEMS.DE
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF
13.72%35.97%9.93%13.90%-4.54%26.62%-8.86%23.48%-14.04%10.16%

Correlation

The correlation between XDUK.DE and CEMS.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2015

0.87

The correlation between XDUK.DE and CEMS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XDUK.DE vs. CEMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XDUK.DE
XDUK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
XDUK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDUK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDUK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XDUK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDUK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

CEMS.DE
CEMS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEMS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XDUK.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XDUK.DE) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XDUK.DECEMS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.43

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

3.29

-1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.89

12.37

-4.48

XDUK.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XDUK.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the CEMS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XDUK.DE and CEMS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XDUK.DECEMS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.37

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.94

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.61

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.49

-0.06

Drawdowns

XDUK.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XDUK.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.87%, roughly equal to the maximum CEMS.DE drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XDUK.DE and CEMS.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XDUK.DECEMS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.87%

-40.20%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.81%

-9.99%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.05%

-17.57%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.05%

-19.55%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.87%

-40.20%

+0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.86%

-1.26%

-1.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.27%

-7.49%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.66%

-0.44%

Volatility

XDUK.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers FTSE 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XDUK.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF (CEMS.DE) at 4.65%. This indicates that XDUK.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XDUK.DECEMS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

4.65%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

11.17%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.17%

13.87%

-1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.12%

15.23%

-1.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

17.43%

-0.65%

XDUK.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XDUK.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XDUK.DE vs. CEMS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XDUK.DE nor CEMS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XDUK.DE and CEMS.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDUK.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDUK.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CEMS.DE.

XDUK.DE tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while CEMS.DE tracks MSCI Europe Enhanced Value. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for XDUK.DE and 0.25% for CEMS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XDUK.DE and CEMS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer